Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(20,049 posts)
3. The problem has never been the satellites themselves. It's getting them up there that's a bitch
Fri May 18, 2012, 11:10 PM
May 2012

The current cost to move material from Earth to orbit is measured in thousands of dollars per pound. Until we can get that number to come down significantly, we won't be able to place sufficient numbers of power satellites in orbit to make a dent in global energy demands. The boost in solar panel efficiency is more than offset by the enormous up-front cost of launch.

Short of a space elevator or a way to manufacture the satellites off-planet (either on the Moon or from a captured asteroid), it will be a long time before we see orbital solar satellites being more than a niche market for clean energy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Could Solar Satellites Be...»Reply #3