Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(39,711 posts)
1. Years ago I said the Hanford Site was a nature preserve...
Fri Aug 26, 2022, 04:35 PM
Aug 2022

... compared to the biological wastelands on the other side of the river.

Aside from burning fossil fuels, agriculture is the most environmentally destructive things humans do. Yes, of course, we all have to eat, but we need to be thinking of ways to minimize agriculture's environmental footprint.

Many of the same people who oppose nuclear power have trouble with the math here as well. Keeping 8 billion people fed is going to be a challenge as the earth warms. It's going to require some sophisticated engineering. We might even have to do some genetic engineering (gasp!).

Turning golf courses into organic farms or growing more hemp isn't going to save the world.

The most remarkable thing about the Hanford Site is that the wastes are largely contained. That's not the case with fossil fuel wastes or agricultural wastes. Mostly we ignore those.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Removal of Some Radio...»Reply #1