Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
9. True, optimism doesn't count for much without dedication.
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:35 PM
Feb 2013

Whatever funds Lockheed is throwing in this direction (or able to throw) it's probably one-tenth of what needs to be appropriated to see results "in time".

A source of energy that is virtually unlimited, and one that wouldn't involve mining or significant amounts of waste, opens a realistic discussion about CCS and turning the clock back. But both fusion and MSRs are going nowhere without a big financial commitment.

Your post sums it up nicely...CRH for Sec of Energy

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Lockheed Martin bets big ...»Reply #9