Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PamW

(1,825 posts)
16. Nuclear weapons had NOTHING to do with it.
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:29 AM
Feb 2013

CRH,

Do you know how much fissile material is in US weapons that came from commercial power plants?

The answer is ZERO.

The US nuclear weapons program had reactors at Hanford and Savannah River that were specially designed "production" reactors. They were specifically designed to make nuclear bomb fuel with no other constraints.

The US nuclear weapons industry had all the bomb-grade material it could use when those reactors were operating. The nuclear weapons industry didn't need anything from the commercial sector AT ALL!!

That's a convenient myth that the anti-nukes like to pander.

In fact, those production reactors worked so well and the nuclear weapons program had so much material that those reactors were eventually shut down.

The nuclear weapons design labs learned how to better design weapons so they needed less bomb fuel, and as new nuclear weapons were made, the out-dated ones had their bomb fuel recycled to the new weapons.

So decades ago; the nuclear weapons program had all the bomb fuel it needed for the foreseeable future and then some. In fact, the nuclear weapons program has enough material to keep bombs operating well into the NEXT century.

PamW

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Lockheed Martin bets big ...»Reply #16