Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jonthebru

(1,034 posts)
4. You are making a couple of assumptions.
Sat Mar 23, 2013, 08:33 PM
Mar 2013

When the tipping point occurs and the cascade begins, with global climate change the livability of the whole planet may be poor. Even with good personal planning wherever one lives, the air and water situation and of course the out of control local order may make it nearly impossible to survive in most areas.
By the way, the Black Plague, 75 to 100 million, and the Flu Pandemic of 1918, 50 to 100 million, both culled the population.

So, whom will it be? Thee or me? WWII killed 50 to 70 million, Russia lost around 24 million... there must have been a lot of empty areas after that. Today with the use of depleted uranium in armaments the areas are unusable unless further death from radiation poisoning is accepted.

You are very correct about one thing; population is the problem. Also, people tend to forget. Our cultures will have to be forced to become truly "sustainable."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»How do we get out of here...»Reply #4