Environment & Energy

caraher

(6,283 posts)

14. Huh.

Sun Feb 26, 2012, 10:58 PM

Feb 2012

"VICTORY!! VICTORY!!! Kris LOSES again!!"

Stay classy.

Meanwhile I'm with Josh: "The failure of alternate energy sources should never be cheered." I don't see why even the most diehard fans of nuclear energy prefer less solar, when the one thing we can all presumably agree is that we need to cut fossil fuel use. Installed wind and solar is SO far from reaching any level where intermittency is a severe constraint that arguing whether the practical maximum is 20%, 50%, 90% or 100% is quite pointless.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama's Budget Nixes New Money For Program That Funded Solyndra [View all] kristopher Feb 2012 OP

LOL, this is actually kind of funny. joshcryer Feb 2012 #1

Don't say I didn't warn you!! PamW Feb 2012 #2

No reputable scientists would make false representations like that kristopher Feb 2012 #3

I EXPLAINED THAT!! PamW Feb 2012 #4

No you didn't. kristopher Feb 2012 #6

DONE! PamW Feb 2012 #7

Not done. kristopher Feb 2012 #8

OH BROTHER!! PamW Feb 2012 #9

Simply put, you are not telling the truth kristopher Feb 2012 #10

Poor READING COMPREHENSION!!! PamW Feb 2012 #11

This says it ALL!! PamW Feb 2012 #12

SURE THERE IS!!! PamW Feb 2012 #5

Evidently Kris didn't read this part! PamW Feb 2012 #13

Huh. caraher Feb 2012 #14

I sick and tired of Kris PamW Feb 2012 #17

There is no 2004 report, Pam. You made that up. kristopher Feb 2012 #15

WRONG and DISENGENUOUS!!! PamW Feb 2012 #16

Legitimate scientists do not fabricate data like you do. kristopher Feb 2012 #18

I DO NOT FABRICATE!!! PamW Feb 2012 #20

THEY SURE DO!!! PamW Feb 2012 #21

Kicked for review nt kristopher Jul 2013 #22

Obama seeks to make renewable Production Tax Credit permanent kristopher Feb 2012 #19