Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Media's Failure With the Biggest Story in the World [View all]
The Media's Failure With the Biggest Story in the World
4/11/2015
...Pooley is only one of several journalists who have spoken of the failure of the media. In 2009, Joe Romm wrote that, although "our scientific understanding of business-as-usual projections for global warming has changed dramatically," the U.S. public has largely "remain[ed] in the dark about just how dire the situation is. Why? Because the U.S. media is largely ignoring the story." Romm and others have tried to capture in a phrase the size of the story the media have missed:
Saying that 2010 had been "a stunning year in climate science," which revealed that "human civilization is on the precipice," Romm said that the media have been "missing the story of the century, if not the millennium."
Pulitzer-prize journalist Ross Gelbspan said, "the fact that the planet is caving in around us" is "biggest story in our planet's history." (2)
In 2014, Tom Engelhardt said . . . : "Climate change isn't the news and it isn't a set of news stories. It's the prospective end of all news."
To return to Pooley's parable: We cannot imagine that, if we knew that we had only 10 years to divert or destroy a humanity-destroying meteor heading straight at us, the governments and media would continue with business as usual. Governments, at least those with technological capabilities, would work together day and night to figure out the best approach, then provide all the needed resources - many trillions of dollars, if necessary - to prevent the destruction of human civilization.
The U.S. media would, as they did in World War II, explain the nature of the threat and why citizens will need to make sacrifices - perhaps enormous ones, because no sacrifice would be too great.
In that situation, it is possible that a contrarian movement might emerge, declaring the report about the meteor to be a scientific hoax. But if so, the media would surely not take it seriously - unless, at least, many of our best scientists agreed. Rather than spreading the contrarian story, the various news organizations would, recognizing that they had the biggest story since the beginning of human civilization, spare no expense in covering it.
However, with regard to climate change, the media - especially the American media - have acted in a very different way. Far from treating the CO2 threat as the biggest story since the beginning of civilization, they have failed to treat it as the story of the millennium, or the century, or the decade, or even the year.
Dimensions of the Media's Failure: False Balance
The U.S. media's failure to give the American people an accurate understanding of global warming and climate change has several dimensions....
Read more~
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/30006-the-media-s-failure-with-the-biggest-story-in-the-world
4/11/2015
...Pooley is only one of several journalists who have spoken of the failure of the media. In 2009, Joe Romm wrote that, although "our scientific understanding of business-as-usual projections for global warming has changed dramatically," the U.S. public has largely "remain[ed] in the dark about just how dire the situation is. Why? Because the U.S. media is largely ignoring the story." Romm and others have tried to capture in a phrase the size of the story the media have missed:
Saying that 2010 had been "a stunning year in climate science," which revealed that "human civilization is on the precipice," Romm said that the media have been "missing the story of the century, if not the millennium."
Pulitzer-prize journalist Ross Gelbspan said, "the fact that the planet is caving in around us" is "biggest story in our planet's history." (2)
In 2014, Tom Engelhardt said . . . : "Climate change isn't the news and it isn't a set of news stories. It's the prospective end of all news."
To return to Pooley's parable: We cannot imagine that, if we knew that we had only 10 years to divert or destroy a humanity-destroying meteor heading straight at us, the governments and media would continue with business as usual. Governments, at least those with technological capabilities, would work together day and night to figure out the best approach, then provide all the needed resources - many trillions of dollars, if necessary - to prevent the destruction of human civilization.
The U.S. media would, as they did in World War II, explain the nature of the threat and why citizens will need to make sacrifices - perhaps enormous ones, because no sacrifice would be too great.
In that situation, it is possible that a contrarian movement might emerge, declaring the report about the meteor to be a scientific hoax. But if so, the media would surely not take it seriously - unless, at least, many of our best scientists agreed. Rather than spreading the contrarian story, the various news organizations would, recognizing that they had the biggest story since the beginning of human civilization, spare no expense in covering it.
However, with regard to climate change, the media - especially the American media - have acted in a very different way. Far from treating the CO2 threat as the biggest story since the beginning of civilization, they have failed to treat it as the story of the millennium, or the century, or the decade, or even the year.
Dimensions of the Media's Failure: False Balance
The U.S. media's failure to give the American people an accurate understanding of global warming and climate change has several dimensions....
Read more~
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/30006-the-media-s-failure-with-the-biggest-story-in-the-world
*This was one of those great articles that is SO difficult to "snip" any of it. This is such a tragic topic. The root, really, of the deeply frustrating lack of concern & action to save life on earth. The media is either ignoring it, or worse, giving deniers a platform lending false credibility. I hope many of you have the time to read the article in its entirety!!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
65 replies, 9872 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (190)
ReplyReply to this post
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There is no question in my mind that the #1 issue is Public Financing of campaigns.
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#52
I do think it is very important and the only way to change the system we have
BrotherIvan
Apr 2015
#62
Excellent post. Send me a private message next time you want to organize something.
JDPriestly
Apr 2015
#49
What this planet really needs is democracy without capitalism. K & R +1,000
PatrickforO
Apr 2015
#35
BFEE Frank worked the Congo for Allen Dulles until Lumumba died, coincidentally...
Octafish
Apr 2015
#26
Right beneath your post, Stonepounder. You and I had essentially the same response to that
tblue37
Apr 2015
#25
When 96% of the marine species go extinct because ocean acidification is on par with
tblue37
Apr 2015
#22
Seriously cantbeserious, thank you for posting this! Fascinating how in 10 years, TEN years,
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#37
An asteroid wouldn't be inconvenient. Climate change requires that WE change our behavior.
Gregorian
Apr 2015
#45
If a killer asteroid were headed toward Earth, and the Koch brothers made money off denying it,
tclambert
Apr 2015
#50
Discussion of climate change upsets rich people because it implies that their unrestrained
whereisjustice
Apr 2015
#54
No "top down" solution from those who are responsable - only distraction and death
Pooka Fey
Apr 2015
#59
K&R. Very disturbing to me too. Shows how strong corporate control of our media is.
Overseas
Apr 2015
#61