Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
7. Digital broadcasting is a good bit less prone to static..
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 07:29 PM
Jan 2012

If you have had a satellite dish on during a heavy rainstorm you may have seen how it pixelates out or freezes and then the signal just goes away. Normally you have either a very good picture or nothing with very little in between.

Satellite broadcasts are digital, now terrestrial TV broadcasting is digital also and gets the same benefits.

Digital broadcasting is also highly resistant or perhaps even immune to "ghosts", which is signal reflection off relatively nearby objects.

Rather like the way it's possible to play a somewhat scratched or dirty DVD because of error correction algorithms in the DVD format, digital broadcasting can correct for signal errors to some extent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATSC_tuner#Error_correction

Error correction is a technology that is used by the ATSC tuner to make sure that any data that is missing can be corrected. For instance, sometimes interference or a poor-quality signal will cause the loss of some data that the ATSC tuner receives. With error correction, the tuner has the ability to perform a number of checks and repair data so that a signal can be viewed on a TV set. Error correction works by adding to the signal before transmission some extra information that can be used upon reception to fill in gaps. Therefore, error correction has the opposite effect of compression—it increases the amount of data to transmit, rather than reducing it like compression does, and it improves the quality and robustness of the signal rather than reducing it. Compression removes redundant (and some non-redundant) data, while error correction adds some redundant data. The reason for using error correction rather than just using less compression and keeping the redundancy that was already there is that error correction systems are specially designed to get the maximum benefit out of a very small amount of redundant data, whereas the natural redundancy of the data doesn't do this job as efficiently, so with error correction the net amount of data needed is still smaller.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The frugal way to do TV... [View all] Fumesucker Jan 2012 OP
On antennas (antennae).. Fumesucker Jan 2012 #1
I am on dialup Tsiyu Jan 2012 #9
Here's an extremely simple but fairly effective homemade antenna made from one piece of wire.. Fumesucker Jan 2012 #10
Thanks! Tsiyu Jan 2012 #11
My pleasure.. Fumesucker Jan 2012 #12
DIY Antennas - I have made several of these, and get excellent UHF reception, but VHF is not as good ad2atlga Nov 2014 #27
What you want is a folded dipole tuned to the frequency Fumesucker Nov 2014 #28
You are so right. cbayer Jan 2012 #2
I agree. I went off of cable as soon as the stations Curmudgeoness Jan 2012 #3
Thanks so much this! onestepforward Jan 2012 #4
Searching through the reviews on indoor antennas on Amazon, this unit stands out for great reviews.. Fumesucker Jan 2012 #5
Those are great ideas. How about local and building interference? When I lived in very rural area... freshwest Jan 2012 #6
Digital broadcasting is a good bit less prone to static.. Fumesucker Jan 2012 #7
Thanks for your time and the excellent information. freshwest Jan 2012 #8
A few trips from a brutal fringe area. dimbear Jan 2012 #13
I've done some more research and found out something about the converter boxes.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #20
Interesting article, thanx. Most of my equipment is ChannelMaster, always open dimbear Feb 2012 #21
Cable or satellite is an insidious financial drain... Fumesucker Feb 2012 #22
I tried 2 different converter boxes and neither one gave me a picture. kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #14
Where is your attenna? And what kind are you using? cbayer Feb 2012 #15
I used rabbit ears for years. They went into the trash. kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #17
We use a $30 antenna from Radio Shack (TV is already HD ready). It makes a lot of difference. cbayer Feb 2012 #18
I've been using these converters from Amazon.com with great success. For a number of RKP5637 Mar 2012 #23
It may not be completely obvious how to hook everything together.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #16
This is a great post, thanks. k&r Little Star Feb 2012 #19
We got DirecTV because of hills blocking signals, but pay $1/month for it. uppityperson Mar 2012 #24
THere is always Hulu.com n/t guardian May 2012 #25
You could get a lot of programs on Hulu for free. RebelOne Dec 2014 #31
RCA preamp TVPRAMP1R dimbear May 2012 #26
Good info here... sendero Dec 2014 #29
we've been doing Roku for years, but i just ordered an Amazon Fire TV box NMDemDist2 Dec 2014 #30
Wood board with old wire clothes hangers cut, bent and attached to it, each other and then the tv. Jetboy Dec 2014 #32
Thanks for Posting! Sherman A1 Jan 2015 #33
I'm finally dropping my cable at the end of the month. xmas74 Jun 2015 #34
Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Frugal and Energy Efficient Living»The frugal way to do TV....»Reply #7