Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: UNESCO Adopts Controversial Jerusalem Resolution [View all]shira
(30,109 posts)14. J-Street says UNESCO vote shows contempt for Jewish people's ties to Temple Mount
        J Street is profoundly disappointed by todays adoption by member states of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Executive Board of a resolution that outrageously seeks to rewrite history by erasing the Jewish peoples deep historical and religious ties to the Temple Mount, known in Hebrew as Har HaBayit.
http://jstreet.org/press-releases/resolution-adopted-unesco-member-states-shows-contempt-jewish-peoples-ties-temple-mount/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							49 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        The U.S., Britain, Germany, Holland, Lithuania and Estonia voted against the resolution.
        oberliner
        Oct 2016
        #1
      
        
        It's never a good thing when a fascist leader starts gobbling up parts of neighboring countries in 
        Little Tich
        Oct 2016
        #17
      
        
        According to international law, Russia is an occupying power in Ukrainian Crimea, not a sovereign.
        Little Tich
        Oct 2016
        #34
      
        
        I hope you understand that it's not even a de facto annexation until every single Palestinian
        Little Tich
        Oct 2016
        #46
      
        
        If there's no legal framework for how wars are waged, it will open up for all kinds of atrocities,
        Little Tich
        Oct 2016
        #16
      
        
        I'm not sure a 2-state proposal exists that puts the wall in a future Palestinian state.
        shira
        Oct 2016
        #23
      
        
        Why is it so wrong to extend the notion of democratic rights to include Palestinians?
        Little Tich
        Oct 2016
        #29
      
        
        You seem to be working under the assumption that an anti-Israel resolution condemning Israel's
        Little Tich
        Oct 2016
        #33
      
        
        Aha - so that's why I didn't find any anti-Semitism in the resolution itself...
        Little Tich
        Oct 2016
        #39
      
        
        The release is accurate, stop with the denial.  While the resolution says Jerusalem...
        shira
        Oct 2016
        #40
      
        
        If the allegations that Israel was changing the status quo in Jerusalem were untrue,
        Little Tich
        Oct 2016
        #41