Israel/Palestine

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)

48. Interesting that you automatically equate the word resistance with terrorism

Reply to shira (Reply #45)

Fri Oct 10, 2014, 01:26 AM

Oct 2014

Last edited Fri Oct 10, 2014, 01:57 AM - Edit history (1)

so any Palestinian cradle to grave who 'resists' Israels occupation and siege is a terrorist?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

British medical journal editor ‘deeply’ regrets anti-Israel letter [View all] King_David Oct 2014 OP

Ha ha ha. LOL King_David Oct 2014 #1

But he did not retract it either he said he regretted the polarization not the letter itself azurnoir Oct 2014 #2

He was horrified - King_David Oct 2014 #5

at the polarization and the David Duke vid azurnoir Oct 2014 #6

Isn't it ironic that Ang was attempting to boycott Jewish Doctors King_David Oct 2014 #25

He never retracted it and never ate a chocolate egg either King_David Oct 2014 #7

Remember all the excuses for the David Duke video here on DU ? King_David Oct 2014 #3

edited is this satisfactory to you? azurnoir Oct 2014 #8

He should regret it. Scientific and Medical journals should not incorporate non-scientific still_one Oct 2014 #4

Bull. aranthus Oct 2014 #9

You mean he regrets being targeted for intimidation and a smear campaign Scootaloo Oct 2014 #13

Got some links for that? King_David Oct 2014 #26

The Lancet editor relents on medical journal’s unbalanced attacks on Israel King_David Oct 2014 #10

Senior Israeli scientist resigns over Lancet’s Gaza letter King_David Oct 2014 #11

Heres a link in case anyone wants to read what DU members had to say about the POS Doctors King_David Oct 2014 #12

Our World: Israel bashers’ phony contrition Jefferson23 Oct 2014 #14

I think the Lancet started bleeding subscriptions, King_David Oct 2014 #15

What does that have to do with a letter not retracted ? You also ignored my questions. n/t Jefferson23 Oct 2014 #20

Your using extreme right wing Caroline Glick as your supporting source? King_David Oct 2014 #16

She's the deputy managing editor for the source used here azurnoir Oct 2014 #17

One us an opinion piece King_David Oct 2014 #18

Caroline Glick demonstrates the shared contempt of Palestinians I see in the Israeli government. Jefferson23 Oct 2014 #19

From what I have seen the Lancet will not be attracting academic submissions that they used to. King_David Oct 2014 #21

I'll take it you'll continue to ignore my questions, ok. Your response here is inapplicable. n/t Jefferson23 Oct 2014 #22

Lancet editor apologises for Gaza article by scientists who promoted Ku Klux Klan King_David Oct 2014 #23

Ang sent e-mails containing the Duke video, that seems to be the charge. How did they confirm Jefferson23 Oct 2014 #24

They were 2 of 5. A third is Mads Gilbert who is pro-terror against innocents.... shira Oct 2014 #27

The letter garnered 20,000 signatories but don't let that slow you down :) azurnoir Oct 2014 #28

And you seem proud of that! There were far more than 20,000.... shira Oct 2014 #29

It's a point in fact azurnoir Oct 2014 #30

The fact is 20,000 co-signed on a letter that justifies Hamas terror.... shira Oct 2014 #31

The letter did not 'absolve' Hamas in fact the letter was about the civilian population Gaza azurnoir Oct 2014 #34

Sure it did. Not only did that letter fail to condemn Hamas' rockets... shira Oct 2014 #36

the letter said "people in Gaza" you claim that means Hamas azurnoir Oct 2014 #37

What percentage are Hamas King_David Oct 2014 #39

Now you're playing games, as the people resisting were Hamas & friends.... shira Oct 2014 #40

it would seem that you're saying 2+2=5 in this case azurnoir Oct 2014 #41

Who are the people of Gaza doing the resisting, if not terrorists? n/t shira Oct 2014 #45

Interesting that you automatically equate the word resistance with terrorism azurnoir Oct 2014 #48

You're denying that sentence refers to terror operations as you deny below.... shira Oct 2014 #52

nowhere have I mentioned Manduca and I replied to your comment as you wrote it azurnoir Oct 2014 #54

Do some exploring and see how many letters against it there were King_David Oct 2014 #32

Link it up for us please as it is your own statement azurnoir Oct 2014 #33

Nah King_David Oct 2014 #38

well if as you contend it is so "easy to find" why do you seem unwilling to back up your own words? azurnoir Oct 2014 #42

Whimpered off King_David Oct 2014 #43

I did not say, 20,000 wrote it. The rest of your post is hyperbole, as usual. n/t Jefferson23 Oct 2014 #44

The letter is pro-terror, written by pro-terror people.... shira Oct 2014 #46

uh huh. n/t Jefferson23 Oct 2014 #47

InterPal was designated as terror linked by Bush 2 the UK retracted its claims of terror links azurnoir Oct 2014 #49

The US, Canada, & Australia still consider Interpal a terror org. shira Oct 2014 #51

the UK said the US could present no evidence backing up this Bush2 era judgement azurnoir Oct 2014 #53

duplicate postn/t azurnoir Oct 2014 #50

Title of the aricle has been changed for accuracy because none of the MD's promoted the Klan azurnoir Oct 2014 #35