Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stargazer09

(2,132 posts)
12. It would be the same sort of thing
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 09:05 PM
Aug 2013

For a hetero couple, actually. You wait to get married until you can afford it.

A lot of people join the military while leaving their lovers back home. The military does not pay to have your girlfriend or boyfriend join you wherever you go, nor do they pay for you to go home on leave, regardless of the reasons. They will grant you vacation time, subject to job requirements, etc., but they do not pay for your trips.

Like I said before, the military doesn't owe anyone a spouse.

I'm not trying to sound harsh. This lack of nationwide marriage equality is a bad situation right now, but I don't believe that the military needs to be paying for service members to get married. Paying for a trip to a marriage equality state would count as a payment for a couple to get married, and that is not done for any military member. I can't think of any employer in this country that pays the costs associated with employees getting married, regardless of circumstances.

Honestly Stargazer09 Aug 2013 #1
you're exactly right dlwickham Aug 2013 #2
I have no problem with that premise theHandpuppet Aug 2013 #4
Who has to pay for the cost of traveling to a marriage-equality state? MNBrewer Aug 2013 #3
Not a good idea Stargazer09 Aug 2013 #6
I strongly disagree with you MNBrewer Aug 2013 #8
I respect that Stargazer09 Aug 2013 #9
Perhaps. MNBrewer Aug 2013 #11
It would be the same sort of thing Stargazer09 Aug 2013 #12
A hetero couple can wander over to the base chapel and get a military chaplain to marry them MNBrewer Aug 2013 #15
I am taking it seriously Stargazer09 Aug 2013 #16
This makes sense to me? If benefits are for those married, then it makes RKP5637 Aug 2013 #5
I agree Stargazer09 Aug 2013 #7
Why not empower service chaplains okasha Aug 2013 #10
They are limited by state law Stargazer09 Aug 2013 #13
This doesn't just affect military members Creideiki Aug 2013 #14
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»US military plan to exten...»Reply #12