Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Feminists

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)

12. I'm sorry, I don't understand the question.

Reply to 4th law of robotics (Reply #8)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 01:39 AM

Aug 2012

The issue was meeting their Title IX obligation to offer equal opportunities to each gender. Qunnipiac tried to qualify a non-sport as one of the sports offered for women while at the same time eliminating a recognized sport. There may have been other motivations but the most obvious one is that competititive cheering provided some advantage that allowed more funding of men's sports.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just Because Cheerleading Is Hard Doesn’t Mean It’s a Sport [View all] obamanut2012 Aug 2012 OP

I am one of those who questions anything judged as a sport ProgressiveProfessor Aug 2012 #1

I agree with you 100% on all of this obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #2

it's a huge stretch for me to see chearleading as a sport La Lioness Priyanka Aug 2012 #3

Yes and thus would the cheerleaders deserve credit for part of the revenue? stevenleser Aug 2012 #4

Actually the marching band does ProgressiveProfessor Aug 2012 #5

It's being rebranded as "acrobatics and tumbling" at some schools Gormy Cuss Aug 2012 #7

Maybe they should eliminate a men's team to make room for that competitive cheer squad. Gormy Cuss Aug 2012 #6

I don't think they generally offer non-sports under the athletic department for men 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #8

I'm sorry, I don't understand the question. Gormy Cuss Aug 2012 #12

That's what I think, too obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #9

Why would competitive cheer leading not cost the school money? ProgressiveProfessor Aug 2012 #10

Because they are tied to teh football program at most schools obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #11

That varies from school to school ProgressiveProfessor Aug 2012 #13

It is usually tied to the football program funding obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #14

Hmmm - I guess volleyball is more recognized as a sport TBF Aug 2012 #15

As the OP states, it's not about whether cheerleading is demanding or athletic Gormy Cuss Aug 2012 #16