Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(112,333 posts)
4. There is NOTHING "INERT" about tattoo ink... Many have predicted similar findings for decades...
Fri Nov 28, 2025, 12:14 PM
Friday

-given the explosion of popularity for tattoos and the dramatic extent of them--not a simple anchor on a sailor's arm or similar, but literally blackening out entire chest and arms or tattoos of more than 75% of the body.

I admittedly have a real anti-tattoo bias, but I have long considered it an individual choice, UNTIL health risks are fairly conclusively established. Now, I am so grateful that I always found them personally distasteful, and most of my friends and family have mostly chosen not to get them.

I might add that laser removal is mostly an esoteric choice--it is unlikely to do much to decrease the risk from what would have been distributed foreign body exposure months and years post-tattoo--and thus the body's response to that exposure.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Tattoo ink alters immune ...»Reply #4