What happens when constitutional rights contradict each other?

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

14. mea culpa

I actually don't know that there is no such right but, as you insightfully explained, that right would be in conflict with an individual RKBA and the idea of self-defense. In conclusion, there may be such a right but it is in conflict the current US foundational principles. Protecting such a right would require reformulating the US and rewriting its foundational plans.

1. How do you know that there is no innate right to live in peace? What's the point of outlawing murder except for furthering the right to live in peace?

Murder is illegal because there is a right to life. Killing an unjust aggressor in self-defense is not nor should it be illegal. Nor should it made unreasonably difficult.

2. Coming back to my OP: What happens when two rights exclude each other?

Please provide an instance where this could happen. I don't think there is one.