Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Shamash

(597 posts)
8. Let's just pick #2
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 04:41 PM
Jan 2015

The entire list is cringe-worthy, but since my time is limited, we'll just deal with one of them.

The "Chicago" comment would make sense if the areas the guns were brought in from (and where they are by definition easier to acquire) had higher firearm crime rates. But they do not. The "loose laws" where the guns are available do not show up as a higher incidence of firearm crime in these states and counties.

For instance, this Chicago news outlet talks about guns coming from Mississippi. Well:

firearm homicide rate, Mississippi(2010): 5.6 per 100,000
firearm homicide rate, Chicago(2010): 8.1 per 100,000

Similarly, in June 2010 the Supreme Court struck down some of Chicago's restrictive gun laws. In the following year, the January-June 2011 firearm homicide numbers were 14% lower than for January-June 2010.

So, the "Chicago" item has a ways to go before it can reach the level of merely being wrong.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm not a member of the NRA, but here is my response. kioa Jan 2015 #1
Without debate #4 bugs me! Sick_of_TP Jan 2015 #7
saw the lock Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #2
I've always thought that if a person is unable to defend their position logically, kioa Jan 2015 #3
it's the sinking to Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #4
There's a select few who will debate honestly and civilly, GGJohn Jan 2015 #5
Yes, and I give those posters Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #6
But it really is possible... Veganstein Jan 2015 #16
Let's just pick #2 Shamash Jan 2015 #8
Let me take a shot at these: NYC_SKP Jan 2015 #9
That thread.. virginia mountainman Jan 2015 #10
New Year's Resolutions for Gun-Control religionists. oneshooter Jan 2015 #11
I would add BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #12
You are the one insisting that innocent people have to give up liberties because of your irrational kioa Jan 2015 #13
My favorite: The NRA is exploiting fear? LOL and bullshit. Gun banners depend on fear. NYC_SKP Jan 2015 #17
The entire puprose of that thread is to sucker people into accepting guilt by association. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #14
It far easier to demonize a faceless boogyman than innocent Americans. kioa Jan 2015 #15
overall, you lose jimmy the one Jan 2015 #18
You never fail to entertain. beevul Jan 2015 #19
industrial giants vs firearm industry jimmy the one Jan 2015 #20
Aww poor jimmy, you missed something. beevul Jan 2015 #21
two peas in a pod jimmy the one Jan 2015 #22
Merriam wants a word with you. beevul Jan 2015 #23
pretentious babbling jimmy the one Jan 2015 #24
Lets just cust to the chase shall we? beevul Jan 2015 #25
info please & oxford dictionaires want you jimmy the one Jan 2015 #26
Gun control, when applied as directed, bans guns and infringes on the second amendment. n/t beevul Jan 2015 #27
So equivocation then. beevul Jan 2015 #28
the equivocation is yours jimmy the one Jan 2015 #29
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Suggested New Years Resol...»Reply #8