Gun Control & RKBA

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)

21. "Sorry but I see your post as a self serving trap."

Fri Jun 5, 2015, 03:48 AM

Jun 2015

Of course. The perfectly predictable response of a person who can't present empirical evidence to support their positions.

Quelle surprise!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

90 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Questions for gun control advocates, part 1 [View all] Shamash Jun 2015 OP

Question: why do all the questions assume a deadly, mobile, concealable WMD is a fluffy toy? Unneeded gun ownership is terrorism. Fred Sanders Jun 2015 #1

Readers, see note at top of post and infer appropriately Shamash Jun 2015 #2

The inference says volumes about cartoon scrapers/Third Way® apologists... friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #15

We ain't in Canada, Fred, GGJohn Jun 2015 #4

What about Canada? gejohnston Jun 2015 #7

Why won't those guns just stop killing people? ileus Jun 2015 #10

"Unneeded gun ownership is terrorism." Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #13

Reposting cartoons, while insulting others, is easy. Answering questions is hard friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #16

Well ... Straw Man Jun 2015 #17

"WMD" Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #44

Excellent post! Omnith Jun 2015 #3

I am puzzled upaloopa Jun 2015 #5

The point is two-fold Shamash Jun 2015 #8

It is like a push poll upaloopa Jun 2015 #12

How so? Shamash Jun 2015 #14

"It is like a push poll." NO. It is NOT. NT pablo_marmol Jun 2015 #20

Actually, I do not feel that it's good enough to be called a push-poll rock Jun 2015 #27

Since I'm always interested in self-improvement Shamash Jun 2015 #35

Well I'll try at least in part to answer you rock Jun 2015 #40

That premise is simple Shamash Jun 2015 #46

I do not except your premise rock Jun 2015 #49

I wish to save lives as well Shamash Jun 2015 #52

"I want to save people's lives........." pablo_marmol Jun 2015 #62

"I do not believe we can arrive at a mutually agreed upon viewpoint." pablo_marmol Jun 2015 #63

If saving lives is the objective let's look at the facts. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #66

Please don't tell me ... Straw Man Jun 2015 #18

To upaloopa's credit Shamash Jun 2015 #22

"Sorry but I see your post as a self serving trap." pablo_marmol Jun 2015 #21

Very good thread. GGJohn Jun 2015 #6

244 posts....you're gonna be labeled a Rand Paul loving gun troll. ileus Jun 2015 #9

I've been called a lot of things Shamash Jun 2015 #11

Outstanding post Shamash. I expect you'll be getting nothing but dodges and slurs, though. pablo_marmol Jun 2015 #19

He's not even managing the normal troll posts on this one....remarkable. ileus Jun 2015 #23

I wonder if it shouldn't be retitled. beevul Jun 2015 #24

I guess they'll have to speak up. krispos42 Jun 2015 #25

So let's hear your answers to those questions rock Jun 2015 #26

Not necessary in my case, since I am not a gun control advocate Shamash Jun 2015 #29

Just me Comatose Sphagetti Jun 2015 #28

Sure, I wouldn't have a problem with it. GGJohn Jun 2015 #30

Have never been thrust into that situation before. Comatose Sphagetti Jun 2015 #37

You do have the right to not have firearms in your home, GGJohn Jun 2015 #41

yes, very true Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #51

I'd be comfortable with it Shamash Jun 2015 #31

Or... Comatose Sphagetti Jun 2015 #34

I understand your discomfort Shamash Jun 2015 #38

Thanks for understanding my discomfort. Comatose Sphagetti Jun 2015 #39

Discomfort is not a reason for regulation, though Shamash Jun 2015 #47

I would have no issues with it Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #50

Just me Comatose Sphagetti Jun 2015 #32

Yes I do find that strange and stupid. GGJohn Jun 2015 #33

he needs to read this book gejohnston Jun 2015 #43

Just me Comatose Sphagetti Jun 2015 #36

some people have too many shoes gejohnston Jun 2015 #42

Just curious........... pablo_marmol Jun 2015 #45

Agreed Shamash Jun 2015 #48

#1's false premises jimmy the one Jun 2015 #53

You've never been long on logic or intelligence Shamash Jun 2015 #57

not quite right, shamash, not right at all jimmy the one Jun 2015 #60

#4, specious reasoning exposed jimmy the one Jun 2015 #54

specious casuistry jimmy the one Jun 2015 #55

"The 2nd amendment was a right all right, to serve in a militia." beevul Jun 2015 #56

beev peeved jimmy the one Jun 2015 #61

heimlich maneuver needed, quick jimmy the one Jun 2015 #70

You think you're being cute and sharp witted, GGJohn Jun 2015 #71

my right to self defense, against slurs jimmy the one Jun 2015 #77

The individual right was to keep and bear arms sarisataka Jun 2015 #78

2ndA obsolete & worthless jimmy the one Jun 2015 #81

It still restricts government. beevul Jun 2015 #84

Amendments do not become obsolete... sarisataka Jun 2015 #88

intractables jimmy the one Jun 2015 #89

"(S)ubjective gibberish"? I'll gladly stipulate your expertise on the subject... friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #90

Just for you, james. beevul Jun 2015 #79

most firearms belonged to british 1775 jimmy the one Jun 2015 #82

What a joke. beevul Jun 2015 #83

where it all began jimmy the one Jun 2015 #85

Heres where your problem lies james. beevul Jun 2015 #86

For once I have to agree with you sarisataka Jun 2015 #73

More lack of logic on your part Shamash Jun 2015 #58

shamash's sham jimmy the one Jun 2015 #59

The militia argument again? Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #64

Don't hold your breath ... DonP Jun 2015 #67

the unorganized donP jimmy the one Jun 2015 #68

As usual - ignorance on the half shell DonP Jun 2015 #69

emerson miller catalysts jimmy the one Jun 2015 #72

"Now provide one..." Consider the word 'moot', James. friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #74

Ain't it interesting how they cling to obsolete interpretations? DonP Jun 2015 #76

Does anyone even post over there anymore? Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #80

Apparently. beevul Jun 2015 #87

The 2A protects a individual right according to the Democratic Party platform hack89 Jun 2015 #65

Some Palin-level 'legal scholars' seem to have a problem with that... friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #75