Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Questions for gun control advocates, part 1 [View all]pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)63. "I do not believe we can arrive at a mutually agreed upon viewpoint."
Of course we can't - because we disagree on something MUCH more fundamental that the solutions to gun violence.
You believe that you're entitled to your own set of facts, while we believe that neither of us is!
Prove me wrong! The definition of what constitutes an "assault weapon" is NOT open for debate, and is EASILY VERIFIABLE all over the internet. So check out these links and refute them -- or you will have demonstrated that you haven't done your homework on the single gun restriction related issue ("assault weapons" that causes many Dems the most angst!
http://www.assaultweapon.info/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Question: why do all the questions assume a deadly, mobile, concealable WMD is a fluffy toy? Unneeded gun ownership is terrorism.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#1
The inference says volumes about cartoon scrapers/Third Way® apologists...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#15
Reposting cartoons, while insulting others, is easy. Answering questions is hard
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#16
Outstanding post Shamash. I expect you'll be getting nothing but dodges and slurs, though.
pablo_marmol
Jun 2015
#19
"(S)ubjective gibberish"? I'll gladly stipulate your expertise on the subject...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#90
Some Palin-level 'legal scholars' seem to have a problem with that...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#75