Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
UBCs 
Maybe we differ here, but for any states that don't already have a mandatory requirement, I'd accept voluntary access because anything is better than no access.
Suppressors
I actually didn't say that they don't really protect hearing. I do agree that they don't protect hearing enough at least for the shooter.
AWBs
Problematic for sure.
Mass shooters... IMO rate-of-fire and magazine restrictions will probably be contentious until both sides accept the idea of negotiation as not giving up to "the enemy".
TBH I lost track of looking for info several weeks ago. I would say that I'm not opposed. Feel free to field your thoughts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read