Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: FBI Data Show Gun Background Checks Still Undermined [View all]spin
(17,493 posts)3. It would be wise to update the background check system as was supposed to happen ...
because of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007. This law was signed by the President on Jan 08, 2008.
The NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007
***snip***
Questions and Answers
What is the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007?
The NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 (NIAA), Pub. L. 110-180, was signed into law by the President on January 8, 2008. The NIAA amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 ("the Brady Act"(Pub. L. 103-159), under which the Attorney General established the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). The Brady Act requires Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to contact the NICS before transferring a firearm to an unlicensed person for information on whether the proposed transferee is prohibited from receiving or possessing a firearm under state or federal law. The NIAA was a bipartisan effort to strengthen the NICS by increasing the quantity and quality of relevant records accessible to the system.
Why was the NIAA enacted?
The NIAA was enacted in the wake of the April 2007 shooting tragedy at Virginia Tech. The Virginia Tech shooter was able to purchase firearms from an FFL because information about his prohibiting mental health history was not available to the NICS and the system was therefore unable to deny the transfer of the firearms used in the shootings. The NICS is a critical tool in keeping firearms out of the hands of prohibited persons, but it is only as effective as the information entered into the databases upon which it relies. The NIAA seeks to address the gap in information available to NICS about such prohibiting mental health adjudications and commitments and other prohibiting backgrounds. Filling these information gaps will better enable the system to operate as intended to keep guns out of the hands of persons prohibited by federal or state law from receiving or possessing firearms.emphasis added
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=49#2007
You appear to believe that the solution to the fact that the improvement to the NICS background check hasn't been successfully implemented is simply to "to restrict gun sales." Surely you do not mean that all sales of guns should immediately end?
President Obama mentioned this very problem in an op-ed to the Arizona Post.
First, we should begin by enforcing laws that are already on the books. The National Instant Criminal Background Check System is the filter that's supposed to stop the wrong people from getting their hands on a gun. Bipartisan legislation four years ago was supposed to strengthen this system, but it hasn't been properly implemented. It relies on data supplied by states - but that data is often incomplete and inadequate. We must do better.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/03/13/op-ed-president-obama-arizona-daily-star-we-must-seek-agreement-gun-refo
Obama didn't mention suspending gun sales or even imposing further restrictions on them. He was in favor of enforcing existing law and making sure that the states did a better job of living up to their responsibility to better input the data as required by the NICS Improvement Amendments Act.
That sounds entirely reasonable to me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Good post. And a good reason to restrict gun sales. The system is broken and dangerous people are
Hoyt
May 2012
#1
It would be wise to update the background check system as was supposed to happen ...
spin
May 2012
#3
Does the concept of FIXING features of our government that are broken have any meaning for you?
slackmaster
May 2012
#24
The NRA, TParty and the gun culture segment that uses guns to intimidate are right wingers.
Hoyt
May 2012
#38
Exactly, right wingers have mobilized TBaggers, NRA types, etc., to pass right wing legislation that
Hoyt
May 2012
#43
You can actually defend yourself without a gun, as the 96+% who do not carry prove every day.
Hoyt
May 2012
#45
So you leave home prepared to shoot some "young punk." How many times has that happened?
Hoyt
May 2012
#58
Sure, but it's hilarious how common that explanation is here in the Gungeon
Electric Monk
May 2012
#71
Potentially they are. Non-toters are obviously much less likely to shoot innocents.
Hoyt
May 2012
#36
Hopefully police are doing things that you aren't -- hopefully you are not police wannabe.
Hoyt
May 2012
#44
YOU, and EVERY CCW, BETTER care what others think. That insular militant attitude, SHOULD disqualify
WingDinger
May 2012
#68
re: "BTW, police shoot innocents many more times than CCW citizens."
discntnt_irny_srcsm
May 2012
#57
"Swearing and personal insults in all most every post may indicate a person with
rl6214
May 2012
#66