Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Which bible version would you recommend? [View all]MisterP
(23,730 posts)16. Wiki's also fun for rummaging around in theology
Last edited Fri Feb 27, 2015, 04:46 PM - Edit history (1)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_solaehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_literalism
that's why we might need more Bible-reading and US religious history--it makes the students realize they're not an "original Christian," they're a premillenniallist providentialist sentimentalist lackadaisical Anabaptist-tinged watered-down Wesleyan whose view of history has been imported entirely from one Victorian amateur who renounced the whole shebang and who're using some excommunicated Adventist to filter all their geology through
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here it is on the internet, along with a version for the Quran and the Book of Mormon. . .
Journeyman
Feb 2015
#10
What is gained/or lost in the different translations? Do you have a link where some of those are
F4lconF16
Feb 2015
#25
For both him and I, reading it is an educational experience rather than a comforting one.
F4lconF16
Feb 2015
#26
A good place to start any exploration of "The Bible" is Alan Watt's essay. . .
Journeyman
Feb 2015
#14