Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

TygrBright

(21,163 posts)

1. The problem, then, as you define it, seems to be doctrine, not belief itself.

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Mon Dec 21, 2015, 11:22 AM

Dec 2015

And I definitely concur.

ANY time you set up a doctrine as all-encompassing, absolute and infallible, you distort the fabric of the human spirit.

That applies to secular doctrines as much as to religious doctrines, it's just that at this moment in history religion has a good deal more prominence.

But in the 20th Century we saw several secular regimes founded on the absolute and infallible basis, and they, too, led to genocide, torture, horror, and inhumanity.

thoughtfully,
Bright

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I think, "belief" is a survival-technique rather than a means of revelation. [View all] DetlefK Dec 2015 OP

The problem, then, as you define it, seems to be doctrine, not belief itself. TygrBright Dec 2015 #1

Something that is "all-encompassing, absolute and infallible"... trotsky Dec 2015 #3

There was no longer-lasting totalitarian system than the Roman Empire. rug Dec 2015 #6

In Michael Shermers book The Believing Brain, this is exactly what belief is... cleanhippie Dec 2015 #2

I'll believe it when I see it. Unless it's something Inconvienent like Global Warming. MasonDreams Dec 2015 #4

If that is essentially true, why don't animals have religion? rug Dec 2015 #5