Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: So, What is Wrong with Liberal Religion? [View all]skepticscott
(13,029 posts)25. Not offensive, just laughably uninformed
Last edited Thu Jul 5, 2012, 08:06 PM - Edit history (1)
The biggest problem I see with both religion and opinions opposed to religion is the bullying that comes about when people try to force what they think on others. We are a long way from being evolved enough to leave each other alone.Tell us, please, about all the times that atheists have gone into houses of worship to try to force their opinions, practices, beliefs, convictions or worldview on people who don't share them. Then tell us about all of the times that religious believers have used the law and the institutions of what is supposed to be a secular government (the legislature, the courts, the military, the schools) to try to force everyone to conform to, profess, support or participate in their beliefs and practices, and to exclude those who refuse.
If you can do that honestly, THEN tell us who's leaving who alone and who isn't. And who has a right to be less than happy about it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
139 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just curious here: How was it necessary to the point you make to use the word "laughably"?
patrice
Jul 2012
#58
What's not useful about the fact that you didn't need that word & ONLY turned the person OFF to
patrice
Jul 2012
#67
"need" as in the rational content of the post is the SAME without it. So WHAT is it for? Hurt.
patrice
Jul 2012
#69
Is "odd" not permitted? I like Subject lines, so I don't edit. People can scan the whole thread
patrice
Jul 2012
#83
And you assume falsely that I am advocating for deference. There are more effective ways to
patrice
Jul 2012
#72
Based on experience and common sense. And of course there is more than deductive "proof" for any
patrice
Jul 2012
#75
It's relevant; you're treating a poster here as if it were, with you = judge, jury, & punisher nt
patrice
Jul 2012
#85
You claimed a right to insult others for "truth". AUTHENTIC challenge is fine, insult bastardizes
patrice
Jul 2012
#95
"laughably uninformed" in #25 insults the poster & squelches other "lesser beings" who might
patrice
Jul 2012
#99
We have different understandings of persuasion. I consider mine more complete & that is
patrice
Jul 2012
#86
Pardon me if I think hurting people is bad, besides being counter-productive to one's purpose.
patrice
Jul 2012
#96
"keeping nonsense from ..." Did WE give you authority to exclude or admit participants????
patrice
Jul 2012
#100
Agree. It's the team sport notion of believing or not believing that cause the most problems.
cbayer
Jul 2012
#7
Identifying where we meet IS important, but so is identifying where we depart.
cleanhippie
Jul 2012
#10
The only problem I have is this continued use of the term "atheism" to mean something it is not.
cleanhippie
Jul 2012
#15
This is a complete diversion, but to satisfy your need to be semantically correct,
cbayer
Jul 2012
#18
What we have here is a failure to validate legitimate concerns and problems.
cleanhippie
Jul 2012
#35
While you may think I'm moving in circles, at least I'm trying to find a way forward.
cleanhippie
Jul 2012
#38
I hate religion, in the way I hate lies and bullshit. But who the hell ever talks about destroying?
Evoman
Jul 2012
#77
You seem to want to take the position that one side is "more better" than the other,
cbayer
Jul 2012
#102
I don't laugh at people who embrace religion. I laugh when they try to defend beliefs and utterly
Evoman
Jul 2012
#120
I've not seen liberal believers here defend the actions of the religious right.
cbayer
Jul 2012
#122
Then you need to stop guessing and pay attention to what people are saying instead.
cleanhippie
Jul 2012
#43
I think you need to go back and look at the statement you made, along with its associated question.
eqfan592
Jul 2012
#51
I see our esteemed friend is still afraid to comment on the question of 'what divides us'
Leontius
Jul 2012
#125
Clearly. I guess to some, "common ground" only means moving to where they stand.
cleanhippie
Jul 2012
#39
Larry Hooper. Fred Whitehead. CSF tests, child custody data. "not real citizens"...
dmallind
Jul 2012
#123
Also by forming little power cliques that ridicule non-members, so that society gets the message,
patrice
Jul 2012
#68
Unitarian-Universalists think what we DO (supporting gay rights, social justice, water for all)
LiberalEsto
Jul 2012
#11
Of course I am. Look at the news (well, the few that aren't owned by radical atheist organizations)
Evoman
Jul 2012
#59
And is this a common practice now among any even remotely significant portion...
eqfan592
Jul 2012
#106
Actually becoming more common over the past few years in this nation. Like I said,
humblebum
Jul 2012
#107
humblebum, I'm well aware of what you feel is the "history" of "radical atheism."
eqfan592
Jul 2012
#112
I need a definition of "Liberal Religion". Organized belief that "translates . . . .
patrice
Jul 2012
#61