Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

(6,271 posts)

11. It's perfectly reasonable that Sister Campbell had a candidate she intended to vote for.

Sun May 5, 2013, 05:55 PM

May 2013

I intended to vote for rug, as I mentioned, but it's merely a side issue that I cannot vote, nor can Sister Campbell.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

VIEWPOINT: The American Media Needs To Take A Theology Class (Or Three) [View all] rug May 2013 OP

i think a 'comparative religion' course would be better.. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #1

Agreed. Silver Gaia May 2013 #8

You got to love the NYT's screw-up. hrmjustin May 2013 #3

I'm surprised that even made it into print. rug May 2013 #4

I'm not! n/t hrmjustin May 2013 #5

They must have made an Assumption. rug May 2013 #6

Either lazy, ignorant, or adding the reporters personal belief. hrmjustin May 2013 #9

I wish I were surprised okasha May 2013 #7

I disagree with the claim that there's anything wrong with the correction, though muriel_volestrangler May 2013 #13

While not untrue skepticscott May 2013 #10

I'll get you registered by 2016. rug May 2013 #12