Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
19. A meta study is defiend as 'looking at other studies and not doing their own'
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 04:14 PM
Aug 2013

They found some flaws; but they found significant negative correlation between intelligence and religiosity in 35, and positive correlation in just 2. That is notable. The paper's abstract says:

A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior.


There's nothing saying there are major flaws in general. Ars Technica points out:

Finally, not all studies reviewed are of equal quality, and some of them have been criticized by other researchers. But that is exactly why meta-analyses are performed. They help overcome limitations of sample size, poor data, and questionable analyses of individual studies.
I'm having trouble opening the article, but I would question the validity of any cbayer Aug 2013 #1
There ought to be as many dots above 100 as below. lumberjack_jeff Aug 2013 #2
Correct. That is the point that I was trying to make as well. cbayer Aug 2013 #6
I guess the rest of the world is the opposite of Lake Woebegone; no one is above average. n/t lumberjack_jeff Aug 2013 #8
Let me take a whack at why that's not so. dimbear Aug 2013 #26
It appears that only about 13 out of 137 countries are of average or above intelligence ... Jim__ Aug 2013 #3
And from what I did see, the bulk of those studied (87%) were from western countries. cbayer Aug 2013 #7
Yea, Wilson and Sociobiolgy gave IQ scores a bad reputation. rug Aug 2013 #11
The graph is just one of the 63 studies muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #13
My read was that although they found a higher number of studies with cbayer Aug 2013 #16
I'm not sure what you mean by 'substantiating' correlation muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #17
Because other studies had claimed to have made a correlation, cbayer Aug 2013 #18
A meta study is defiend as 'looking at other studies and not doing their own' muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #19
I am very familiar with what a meta study is, muriel. cbayer Aug 2013 #22
No, the graph posted in the OP does not tell the tale at all muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #23
You are correct about the title. cbayer Aug 2013 #24
I presume you're talking about American atheists muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #25
There is also a correlation between being part of a privilege class and cbayer Aug 2013 #28
"More than 87 percent of the participants were from the US, the UK, and Canada." Jim__ Aug 2013 #4
Mensa members are supposed to be very intelligent so I decided to see how many are religious. ... spin Aug 2013 #5
I don't find this surprising at all. cbayer Aug 2013 #9
In high school I had a close friend who was a member of Mensa. ... spin Aug 2013 #10
Don't get me wrong, I like super intelligent people. cbayer Aug 2013 #14
Unfortunately, being in that top 2% okasha Aug 2013 #20
The Mensa data you quote tells us they are far more nonreligious than the average in America, dimbear Aug 2013 #21
The data on scientists closely matches members of Mensa. ... spin Aug 2013 #27
no data for people above 110 IQ? eShirl Aug 2013 #12
I think those are averages within specific countries. cbayer Aug 2013 #15
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»New meta-analysis checks ...»Reply #19