Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Buckeye_Democrat

(15,345 posts)
12. As I understand it, nobody knows how the information on...
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 01:49 PM
Jan 2017

a 2-D outer surface gets mapped to the 3-D interior... assuming it even happens!

It's clearly not proposing that the 3-D interior of our universe would be like a photographic hologram that isn't tangible.

It appears to be a mathematical construct that was proposed after examining principles related to black holes and recognizing it could be applied to the everything else in the universe as well. The holographic model wasn't pulled out of thin air, but was derived from efforts to avoid contradictions of basic principles of physics in regard to black holes.

How it works, assuming it's an accurate model for everything, isn't well understood. The holographic model makes some different predictions, and that's what is being checked at this point.

For example, there's subtle differences in predictions related to something called cosmic inflation. That's something that supposedly happened in the very early universe that helps explain the almost uniform temperature of the cosmic microwave background radiation. It's a mathematical model that was created to explain the CMB observations. In the holographic model, cosmic inflation is a natural consequence but the effects should be slightly different in the CMB.

Something else that's interesting is that Einstein's General Relativity equations can be derived by first creating a holographic model based on quantum theory! Is it the long-sought merger between quantum theory and relativity? That's sometimes called quantum gravity.

Here's a talk by Tom Banks that delves into it without a bunch of math (skip to about the 45-minute mark for some of the derivations based on the model):



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So who made the hologram? The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2017 #1
mastercard? unblock Jan 2017 #2
The Rebellion shenmue Jan 2017 #3
Apparently a narcissist with a sense of humor. gordianot Jan 2017 #4
A black hole? Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #5
Yep. You are correct. n/t VWolf Jan 2017 #9
Leonard Susskind talks about the idea here... Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #7
Interesting. Snackshack Jan 2017 #6
OKAY, CAN WE PLEASE CHANGE THE CHANNEL THEN? Warren DeMontague Jan 2017 #8
Interesting, yes, but... FiveGoodMen Jan 2017 #10
Ironically Quackers Jan 2017 #11
As I understand it, nobody knows how the information on... Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #12
mapping to higher-d in itself is non-unique. BadgerKid Feb 2017 #13
The Cosmic Microwave Background was born 380,000 years after the Big Bang. DetlefK Feb 2017 #14
Same problem for the ΛCDM model. Buckeye_Democrat Feb 2017 #16
Last time I explored this hole in the ground I didn't come up for a long time. hunter Feb 2017 #15
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»'Substantial evidence' th...»Reply #12