Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
2. I do not see it this way.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:30 AM
Feb 2016

We only have two candidates this time. The one who hits the magic number first. Wins. If you look at the delegate totals between Obama vs Dukakis, you see that Dukakis had far fewer delegates than Obama and could be forced to listen to Jackson, if either Bernie or Hillary hit the nunber (2382) of the 4763, they are the nominee regardless.

In the 1988 race, there were many candidates, some of whom eventually removed themselves from the race and gave over their delegates (asked them to move to Dukakis).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_1988

The fact that Jackson felt he should be considered had no bearing on the actuality. He was not chosen.
So, in esscence, people were able to pressure Dukakis, because the race was flooded with candidates who took delegates that he needed for a clear majority.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Minority Report. Why ...»Reply #2