Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
11. Yes, they're not.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:53 AM
Mar 2016

Had she voted, she would've made it easy for us to see where she really stood. She, of course, was by her husband's bedside as he recuperated from cardiac surgery.

All the above was back before the great Banking collapse of 2008. The deregulation of the Banks started when her husband was president.

The deregulation of the S&Ls started when Ronald Reagan was president. Those lessons also were ignored by Phil Gramm and Bill Clinton, who worked together to repeal the Glass-Steagall New Deal legislation, which enabled banks to follow the deregulatory nirvana bubble long enough to move their money mountain to Switzerland and leave the US taxpayers with the bill.

ETA: Details.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Actions don't matter. tazkcmo Mar 2016 #1
The Oral Optics Octafish Mar 2016 #2
Reading is for nerds tazkcmo Mar 2016 #3
Michigan Gov. Nerd thought it best to hide the lead contamination from the public. Octafish Mar 2016 #5
No surprise to me. tazkcmo Mar 2016 #6
Please accept my condolences on your loss. Octafish Mar 2016 #8
Thank you, Octafish. tazkcmo Mar 2016 #9
That does not actually tell the whole story. Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #4
Not exactly: She was against it, before she was for it, before she didn't vote on it. Octafish Mar 2016 #7
So she did not vote for the bill Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #10
Yes, they're not. Octafish Mar 2016 #11
So because deregulation Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #12
Considering how she consistently supports Wall Street over Main Street, yes. Octafish Mar 2016 #14
I don't see how this proves Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #15
It's not supposed to prove anything. Octafish Mar 2016 #17
Actually, yes, I do Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #18
I can relate. I felt the EXACT SAME WAY when I voted for Bill Clinton in 1992. Octafish Mar 2016 #19
You keep on posting long articles Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #20
Why do you care if I post long articles? They're solid fact. Octafish Mar 2016 #21
Because they're off topic Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #22
Off topic to you, but who cares? Octafish Mar 2016 #23
Why would I argue that? Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #24
So why demand I prove to you what you don't want to know? Octafish Mar 2016 #25
K&R amborin Mar 2016 #13
Brooksley Born: Still Telling the Uncomfortable Truths About Wall Street Octafish Mar 2016 #16
"Hillary Clinton could not afford such a principled position." The end. Mic drop n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #26
''Integrity is for paupers.'' Octafish Mar 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Cement Life Raft - Pr...»Reply #11