Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
33. So I can take this post as a "no I can't refute the claim" post.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 09:26 AM
Mar 2016

Name one of her accomplishments as SOS, and no, visiting the most countries and flying the most miles don't count. Below is one for you to start your counter argument.

Here's one of my problems with Hillary's tenure as SOS, please refute. Hillary advocated for a Syrian no fly zone which could potentially put us into a direct conflict with Russia. Discuss.

Unrec. Agschmid Mar 2016 #1
lot's of substantive discussion since you posted... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #41
... I'm sticking with my first impression. Agschmid Mar 2016 #44
don't let the facts get in the way tk2kewl Mar 2016 #51
"Facts"... Agschmid Mar 2016 #108
please feel free to post a Clinton foreign policy accomplishment we can all be proud of tk2kewl Mar 2016 #113
for some reason if we critique Hillary PatrynXX Mar 2016 #130
You will never get an answer to that from a Hillary supporter notadmblnd Mar 2016 #227
Just as substantive as the OP vdogg Mar 2016 #89
really... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #93
That's why I don't unrec SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #134
It's more substance than in your original comment. Next. themaguffin Mar 2016 #194
indeed tk2kewl Mar 2016 #195
but themaguffin Mar 2016 #200
Or, since you couldn't be troubled to offer any support for YOUR "argument", let's just ignore this. brooklynite Mar 2016 #2
She was horrible at it. Kissinger may beg to differ though. Broward Mar 2016 #3
Well, he would. pangaia Mar 2016 #72
And the MIC likes eternal war. jwirr Mar 2016 #135
"Nearly every foreign policy victory of President Obama’s second term has Secretary Clinton’s BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #244
LOL! Lather. Rinse. Repeat. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #4
exactly what is wrong with the portrayal of Clinton as a good foreign policy choice tk2kewl Mar 2016 #42
Three opinion pieces, all "meaningful"? Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #53
do you really have enough bullets to shoot all the messengers? tk2kewl Mar 2016 #71
Tell Naomi that "Hillary" has two of the letter l. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #105
It will be over for them shortly. Tommy2Tone Mar 2016 #145
That's the kind of in-depth rebuttal for which Hillary's supporters have become famous. Marr Mar 2016 #184
You want an in-depth rebuttal of a tweet? Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #186
I was thinking more along the lines of the thread's topic. Marr Mar 2016 #188
I took issue with a specific comment, and I responded. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #189
So you have nothing on the thread's topic then. Got it. Marr Mar 2016 #191
that poster will go on my hide list after this thread dies tk2kewl Mar 2016 #193
Why wait? Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #237
k tk2kewl Mar 2016 #238
bye bye! Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #240
Are you seriously contesting that Hillary Clinton is a neocon? CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #83
the poster is not contesting anything... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #86
But the founder of the neocon movement endorsed Hillary last week CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #102
prediction: tk2kewl Mar 2016 #103
I'm predicting crickets on this one. GoneOffShore Mar 2016 #100
I mean...my blood curdles when I think about the neocon founder endorsing Hillary CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #106
And HRC treats Kagan's endorsement in the same way Drumpf has treated David Duke's. GoneOffShore Mar 2016 #138
But Hillary Clinton's hand-picked Kagan as one of her advisers while she was Secretary of State CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #143
Not at all. She's never met a war monger she hasn't liked. GoneOffShore Mar 2016 #150
The dirty secret of DU is that apparently we were not all united in principles Hydra Mar 2016 #243
Neolib yes neocon kinda Gwhittey Mar 2016 #107
OH, there's so much more! So, so much more! CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #117
If you're asking if I'm unconvinced that the DU Sanders crowd thinks HRC is a neocon... Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #110
Flop sweat desperation Loki Mar 2016 #119
I'd like to know how you feel about Hillary being endorsed by Kagan, the neocon founder? CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #128
Because even with the horiffic possibility of Loki Mar 2016 #177
But the neocons were in Hillary's camp way before Trump arrived on the scene CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #197
Do you actually think that by dismissing every person that might disagree Loki Mar 2016 #206
Your points are well taken and dead on. Unfortunately, we're outnumber by about 7-1 right now. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #132
Clearly, you've been presented with facts. I've spent a great deal of time and effort CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #164
Your "facts" are laced with opinion. So are mine. We've come to different conclusions. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #166
I am not stating opinion. I've laid out facts. CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #171
Kagan did NOT endorse Hillary for president. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #178
Do you have any comment on Robert Kagan endorsing Hillary? CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #123
Ok. I'll bite. Who is that? Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #133
Robert Kagan founded PNAC--he hatched the neocon, war movement. CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #141
Hm. So, Kagan says he'd be forced to vote for Hillary if Trump is the nominee. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #142
Kagan has praised Hillary's foreign policy stances CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #155
Well, Kagan and I agree on one thing and disagree on another: Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #163
It's clear that Hillary is helping the neocons CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #170
When I think of all the millions of lives destroyed by PNAC it turns my stomach. polly7 Mar 2016 #154
Yes, there is absolutely no way to justify this, but I am hoping as more learn CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #162
Do you have any comment about Obama knowing Bill Ayers? Loki Mar 2016 #210
Obama didn't appoint Bill Ayers as his Middle East adviser when he became President CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #222
Really? Loki Mar 2016 #233
This message was self-deleted by its author Marr Mar 2016 #185
Please show me where Senator Sanders has called Hillary a neocon. notadmblnd Mar 2016 #228
I did not say that. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #229
Then how did this sentence get in your post? notadmblnd Mar 2016 #230
The subject of the sentence is "The Nation," not "the guy" Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #235
The Nation isn't calling Hillary Clinton a neocon either. notadmblnd Mar 2016 #236
The original title called Hillary a neocon. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #239
If I had time this morning, I'd look this up. noamnety Mar 2016 #5
That's not a terribly difficult thing to do AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #129
While I'm not disagreeing with your point noamnety Mar 2016 #192
HRC was given SOS to set her up for a 2nd run at POTUS... ReallyIAmAnOptimist Mar 2016 #242
That Rice has such a resume AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #250
a valid point, and you and I might believe that noamnety Mar 2016 #266
Her "experience" as SOS was an unmitigated disaster AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #271
These kind of comments feel creepy. FarPoint Mar 2016 #6
Totally. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #11
Said in your best madokie Mar 2016 #15
what i find creepy is padding one's resume with death. eom. tk2kewl Mar 2016 #50
They are proud of her accomplishments. Broward Mar 2016 #52
maybe... but i'm not sure tk2kewl Mar 2016 #90
I forgot the sarcasm tag. Broward Mar 2016 #99
I find this tone of discussion disheartening. FarPoint Mar 2016 #144
do you like the tone of Hillary's statements in the video... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #146
I decline to watch Fox News propaganda. FarPoint Mar 2016 #148
It's CBS tk2kewl Mar 2016 #153
Remains propaganda for fodder. FarPoint Mar 2016 #156
an interview of your candidate expressing her own thoughts is propaganda? tk2kewl Mar 2016 #157
Like I said, no thank you. FarPoint Mar 2016 #160
Stay blind, my friend. nt PonyUp Mar 2016 #263
I'm voting for Hillary Clinton... FarPoint Mar 2016 #265
"adds nothing to the true mission of having a Democratic President elected" Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #64
+1 Paka Mar 2016 #111
+2 oldandhappy Mar 2016 #176
Branding is exactly the right word Fairgo Mar 2016 #213
That's EXACTLY what I was going to say!! dana_b Mar 2016 #215
So, you're a party over purpose person then? Bubzer Mar 2016 #122
I am genuinely feeling bad for our opponents as they are reduced to this... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #7
So I can take this post as a "no I can't refute the claim" post. A Simple Game Mar 2016 #33
It would seem so. bvf Mar 2016 #104
Both Condi and Kerry have flown more miles karynnj Mar 2016 #198
I never will understand that tularetom Mar 2016 #8
This was pm'd to me by another DUer... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #23
I completely aree with that sentiment.. disillusioned73 Mar 2016 #31
A fine example edgineered Mar 2016 #46
The deal was made during the June meeting in Georgetown when Obama slipped off the plane leveymg Mar 2016 #48
Not to mention eggman67 Mar 2016 #58
Yes. Follow the tax-free money. leveymg Mar 2016 #59
Yes, I remember it this way too n/t BuelahWitch Mar 2016 #199
That was my take on it also. Bjornsdotter Mar 2016 #82
Agree!!! TxGrandpa Mar 2016 #120
He held all the cards, but she got exactly what she wanted tularetom Mar 2016 #175
He recognized he did not have all the cards.- she represented the only threat of an in party karynnj Mar 2016 #202
These are good points, especially how the Clintons wound up coming to Obama's rescue at times Hydra Mar 2016 #245
Obama probably felt badly since he had beat her in the election so badly..LOL..n/t monmouth4 Mar 2016 #9
Or was his arm twisted? tk2kewl Mar 2016 #20
No doubt in my mind. So many other better choices..n/t monmouth4 Mar 2016 #22
...when she ran on her husband's record, no less. cprise Mar 2016 #87
He beat her so badly? Beacool Mar 2016 #256
This is disgusting. Doesn't merit an explanation . n/t livetohike Mar 2016 #10
Instead of being outraged we should be magnanimous and forgiving. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #13
Preposterous JohnnyLib2 Mar 2016 #12
This constant need to degenerate Clinton's successes will be sufrommich Mar 2016 #14
Simply attaining the position is not a meaningful success tk2kewl Mar 2016 #16
When did Hillary Clinton say "it's my turn" ? sufrommich Mar 2016 #18
She didn't say so publicly. But do you think Obama really thought she was his best option? tk2kewl Mar 2016 #19
In other words,it's a fake quote designed to paint her sufrommich Mar 2016 #24
read into it whatever makes you feel better... Do you think GWB would have been a good choice? tk2kewl Mar 2016 #32
It gets even 'better' cprise Mar 2016 #80
No one thinks she literally said "it's my turn" Bradical79 Mar 2016 #115
I was a Dem in upsate NY Gwhittey Mar 2016 #139
It's over for Bernie Renew Deal Mar 2016 #28
so more neocon foreign policy then, i guess tk2kewl Mar 2016 #35
They aren't Democrats, they never were. Loki Mar 2016 #212
Oh noes! Big tent got smaller! Someone said we aren't here! Hydra Mar 2016 #246
It's called frustration. Beacool Mar 2016 #258
She was pretty bad at it. bigwillq Mar 2016 #17
The Clinton's still controlled wide swaths of the Dem establishment after losing the primary FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #21
Of course that's your theory. sufrommich Mar 2016 #25
what's your theory? tk2kewl Mar 2016 #26
My theory is that Obama respected her intelligence and sufrommich Mar 2016 #30
even though he campaigned against her on iraq? tk2kewl Mar 2016 #34
Because she is the single most respected and admired woman in the world? Renew Deal Mar 2016 #27
"How does it get to be ones turn to be SOS?" tk2kewl Mar 2016 #37
... "The American Conservative" Agschmid Mar 2016 #43
how about the nation, salon, NY Times, truth-out, forbes, etc, etc... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #47
This poster loves them some RW sources. Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2016 #136
Yup. Agschmid Mar 2016 #137
"You're just attacking the messenger". Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2016 #140
+1 Starry Messenger Mar 2016 #201
first paragraph from your link tk2kewl Mar 2016 #209
That woman is Angela Merkel, not Hillary Clinton. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #55
Link? Renew Deal Mar 2016 #62
That poll is Americans-only. We were talking worldwide, I believe? Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #67
Yes SheenaR Mar 2016 #181
Of course. senz Mar 2016 #260
Not any more, it isn't. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #66
It's rare for any European politician to win four elections in a row. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #70
Just using that prediction to illustrate her drop in popularity. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #77
But tellingly: the dissatisfaction comes from the right. eom Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #85
Not entirely. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #91
I think you mean that her unpopularity with the left has been a constant Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #131
Is she really the most qualified in terms of foreign policy experience? Armstead Mar 2016 #61
Are we talking about now or 2008? Renew Deal Mar 2016 #69
Clinton had stronger credentials and interests in other areas Armstead Mar 2016 #76
YOU WANTED HILLARY TO DO WOMEN'S WORK? aquart Mar 2016 #207
nonsense, look at her past those were her interest areas karynnj Mar 2016 #269
kerry was among the most qualified after about 20 years karynnj Mar 2016 #268
what qualities and achievements do people cite when deciding such a thing? tk2kewl Mar 2016 #78
Really? polly7 Mar 2016 #84
Lol, she certainly was a disaster when it came to Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan. Vattel Mar 2016 #29
Iraq... see #32 tk2kewl Mar 2016 #36
Even critics understate how catastrophically bad the Hillary Clinton-led NATO bombing of Libya was coyote Mar 2016 #38
"Hillary-led" ... LOL BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #109
? Gwhittey Mar 2016 #149
Pardon? Who wants to have it both ways, again? Marr Mar 2016 #208
She certainly wasn't "a quiet little BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #218
I have seen no one claim that Hillary Clinton dictated foreign policy by fiat. Marr Mar 2016 #225
Sheesh - that's been the whole specious argument BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #234
She did very well as SoS JustABozoOnThisBus Mar 2016 #39
and the sorry state of our politics... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #40
yes she did - particularly since she came in after 8 years of fumbled foreign policy from bush DrDan Mar 2016 #57
cite a Clinton foreign policy achievement you are proud of tk2kewl Mar 2016 #81
how about letting these folks speak DrDan Mar 2016 #161
no snark... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #167
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #45
lol tk2kewl Mar 2016 #75
A Better Question -- Why wasn't she appointed to something more in line with her experience? Armstead Mar 2016 #49
Resume. Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #60
Yep. She got to burnish her resume for the election....at our expense Armstead Mar 2016 #63
ours and many others expense around the globe tk2kewl Mar 2016 #74
Not as prestigious. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #68
Selling fracking in the wide world alone was disastrous. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #54
Right. Because SOS's routinely run the world behind the President's back. randome Mar 2016 #79
"We came, we saw, he died" Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #88
It was Obama's call, not hers. He is a very smart man not given to manipulation. randome Mar 2016 #159
You mean he decided to jump back on the fence about gay rights all by himself? Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #173
No, I mean he's Commander In Chief, not Clinton. randome Mar 2016 #211
Let's keep it that way, especially the "not Clinton" part. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #223
The ones aligned with Kissenger probably do tk2kewl Mar 2016 #98
Her job was to advise Obama. You make a common mistake when you take someone else's words... randome Mar 2016 #121
seemed she was quite pleased with killing Qaddafi tk2kewl Mar 2016 #126
I've posted my take on her 'glee' with killing Qaddafi before. randome Mar 2016 #151
Yeah, I beleive her tenure as SOS was abysmal. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #56
Unrec, so sick of right wing trolls running amok on this board with their garbage. Pisces Mar 2016 #65
. tk2kewl Mar 2016 #73
Wait Gwhittey Mar 2016 #158
+1! What makes BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #219
Hear, hear!!!! Beacool Mar 2016 #257
That's because many are Repubs in sheep's clothing or just bots. It's crazy the right wing Pisces Mar 2016 #270
Obama wanted to be assured that he INdemo Mar 2016 #92
"Bill Clinton wanted her to challenge Obama even as SOS" tk2kewl Mar 2016 #95
Well, apparently she did challenge Obama on Libya if the latest emails released by the FBI are true. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #179
yup tk2kewl Mar 2016 #180
Do you remember when Hill went missing, before she conceded to Obama! peace13 Mar 2016 #94
No rock Mar 2016 #96
"No we can't" tk2kewl Mar 2016 #101
"Can we just be honest about why Hillary even got to be SOS..." rock Mar 2016 #172
I never thought about it that way- you're brilliant! Hydra Mar 2016 #247
It was a price for supporting Obama at the convention in 2008. He paid thereismore Mar 2016 #97
Republicans in the senate who confirmed her... jcgoldie Mar 2016 #112
According to my peeps on the inside Chalco Mar 2016 #114
really?... tell us what your inside peeps have to say tk2kewl Mar 2016 #116
Organized, compassionate, practical, open to discussion, open to viewpoints, good listener, etc. etc Chalco Mar 2016 #214
can you be honest azureblue Mar 2016 #118
nice counter argument tk2kewl Mar 2016 #124
Not worth the hide, don't take the bait. Agschmid Mar 2016 #125
Obama and Hillary made this deal so he could get her delegates and win the nomination Arazi Mar 2016 #127
History has tried hard to teach us that we can’t have good government under politicians. Mark Twain Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #147
her foreign policy successes FreedomRain Mar 2016 #152
Cool allegations. LanternWaste Mar 2016 #165
the op was deliberately provocative... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #168
So Gwhittey Mar 2016 #169
171 Replies SheenaR Mar 2016 #174
neolib economy, neocon war, full steam ahead! tk2kewl Mar 2016 #187
Out of those 2 replies, 1 was simply a recitation of praise for HRC Arazi Mar 2016 #203
K/R UglyGreed Mar 2016 #182
looks like i hit a nerve tk2kewl Mar 2016 #183
Playing her song artislife Mar 2016 #190
Truth to power, baby! pdsimdars Mar 2016 #196
The real cause is imperialism. Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2016 #204
and the only american politician with the guts to call this shit out: tk2kewl Mar 2016 #205
Don't forget her role in the Honduran coup Arazi Mar 2016 #216
I saw John Perkins talk about imperialism on the Thom Hartmann Show. Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2016 #224
"Little Miss Shortcuts." closeupready Mar 2016 #217
Very cheap shot! BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #221
Others were better qualified. moondust Mar 2016 #220
It's almost certain it was a horse trade Hydra Mar 2016 #248
I think she was given the position for endorsing Obama after she bowed out of the 2008 race. notadmblnd Mar 2016 #226
Simplistic peevishness. randome Mar 2016 #231
You think it's more complicated than that? notadmblnd Mar 2016 #232
Assassination of environmental activist in Honduras and Hillary's record there... Gmak Mar 2016 #241
Anyone remember the news silence after Qaddafi was killed? virgista Mar 2016 #249
What bullshit Hekate Mar 2016 #251
Evidence for the news blackout: blank looks from friends and family when you mention Libya debacle virgista Mar 2016 #255
So you saying Obama has poor judgement. Historic NY Mar 2016 #252
The caul fell from my eyes in 2010 when he and Boehner tried to cut Social Security. virgista Mar 2016 #261
"Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer." senz Mar 2016 #253
I was headed to the bottom of this thread to say exactly this Samantha Mar 2016 #262
Yes, I'm sure of it, too. senz Mar 2016 #264
Yawn....... Beacool Mar 2016 #254
The workers liked her. HassleCat Mar 2016 #259
K&R for the discussion this OP generated. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #267
Let's be even more honest about her national career. Orsino Mar 2016 #272
Actually, it was John Kerry's turn Freddie Stubbs Mar 2016 #273
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Can we just be honest abo...»Reply #33