Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
20. Precisely what Goldman would think.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 04:43 PM
Mar 2016
Larry Summers: Goldman Sacked

By Greg Palast
Reader Supported News, September 16, 2013

Joseph Stiglitz couldn't believe his ears. Here they were in the White House, with President Bill Clinton asking the chiefs of the US Treasury for guidance on the life and death of America's economy, when the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers turns to his boss, Secretary Robert Rubin, and says, "What would Goldman think of that?"

Huh?

Then, at another meeting, Summers said it again: What would Goldman think?

A shocked Stiglitz, then Chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisors, told me he'd turned to Summers, and asked if Summers thought it appropriate to decide US economic policy based on "what Goldman thought." As opposed to say, the facts, or say, the needs of the American public, you know, all that stuff that we heard in Cabinet meetings on The West Wing.

Summers looked at Stiglitz like Stiglitz was some kind of naive fool who'd read too many civics books.

CONTINUED...

http://www.gregpalast.com/larry-summers-goldman-sacked/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Seems like I've been battling the Friedman disciples forever now. mmonk Mar 2016 #1
Buy Partisan Answer: Swiss Banking at UBS Octafish Mar 2016 #3
Again Octafish, you outdo yourself. It's why you are mmonk Mar 2016 #4
Thank you, mmonk! You know what they say is crazy, doing the same thing over and over for nought. Octafish Mar 2016 #7
and Malaysia, thanks to Hillary: amborin Mar 2016 #5
Taking the M out of the BRICS works. (What a speech to G-S sounds like) Octafish Mar 2016 #25
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #2
What our government does ''Over There,'' they bring back to do in the Homeland. Octafish Mar 2016 #6
Yes, what we did to others, we're now doing to the US. mmonk Mar 2016 #10
People aren't CURIOUS anymore. Octafish Mar 2016 #26
You've got that right. mmonk Mar 2016 #31
David Pion-Berlin says that every time, from Pinochet to Martinez de Hoz, monetarism MisterP Mar 2016 #8
Helps explain the wall-to-wall surveillance of a Free People™ Octafish Mar 2016 #9
TPTB globally want the rest of US to obediently HEEL, STFU, or DISAPPEAR. That's for sure. K&R#15 bobthedrummer Mar 2016 #11
''Looking Forward'' not only cleared war criminals Bush and Cheney, but the Banksters, as well. Octafish Mar 2016 #13
. mmonk Mar 2016 #12
The Rich Get Richer Octafish Mar 2016 #14
As it was designed. mmonk Mar 2016 #16
Precisely what Goldman would think. Octafish Mar 2016 #20
K&R The most defining act for a liberal of our age is detachment from Wall St. raouldukelives Mar 2016 #15
And they made us jump off the cliff so they could land on something softer than the rocks. Octafish Mar 2016 #18
^^^ bobthedrummer Mar 2016 #17
For NAFTA Octafish Mar 2016 #19
Kick and Highly Recommend kristopher Mar 2016 #21
Hillary Clinton was a Wal-Mart Director for 6 Years Octafish Mar 2016 #22
It's the kind of information the media is specifically tasked with obscuring. kristopher Mar 2016 #23
NYT held story of Bush spying on USA in October 2004. Octafish Mar 2016 #24
K&R !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SamKnause Mar 2016 #27
we do not need any more of this! K and R bbgrunt Mar 2016 #28
Those "RW asswipes" may like the "new DU" highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #29
K&R vintx Mar 2016 #30
The comfort of the rich depends on an abundant supply of the poor. Voltaire Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #32
Bookmarking this excellent read. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #33
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Economics -- New Democrat...»Reply #20