Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
2. And by the way, on superdelegates,
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 05:48 AM
Mar 2016

it's true they don't "have to" do anything. But they might think it is in the best interests of winning the general election to ratify who ever won the election with the pledged delegate count. Similarly they don't "have to" vote for Clinton just because they endorsed her once. There is plenty of history of superdelegates switching candidates.

And remember, if Bernie won the pledged delegates, he would then need only 50% of the superdelegates to neutralize the effect of superdelegates. He can put that together from those who are currently uncommitted plus some, but not all, switching from Clinton.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»1332 pledged delegates ar...»Reply #2