Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProfessorPlum

(11,458 posts)
7. yeah. But . . .
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:50 AM
Mar 2016

I would think the nsa could have produced a secure device for her pronto. if they were actually concerned.

I think she's a stinker of a candidate, but the Republicans _routinely_ do things that threatens/destroys our national security as _policy_, and the media couldn't give two shits about it. this just seems, like so many of the Clinton "scandals", to be a special singling out of her behavior compared to the rest of humanity. The apparatus of the state had four years to create a solution that was acceptable for everyone, and they didn't care, so why should we?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Emails: Hillary Clinton a...»Reply #7