Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: Bernie and the "gun" thing [View all]

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
12. This issue is beyond stupid, but Hillary made it clear this morning she will pursue it
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 11:21 AM
Apr 2016

This gun liability issue came up in a debate and Bernie repeated his answer 2 or 3 times to make sure it was absolutely clear. He said if the gun was purchased legally and was not defective, no, the family of a victim of gun violence should not be able to sue the gun manufacturer or retailer. He said if people want to ban guns, fine, that's a different issue.

When you could sue a gun manufacturer or retailer, as Bernie has noted, is if gun safety locks didn't work properly. Or if the gun was intentionally manufactured to be easy to convert into an automatic weapon. Or if a manufacturer or retailer was selling guns into a channel that they could have or should have known was designed to facilitate illegal purchases.

So Hillary was basically suggesting this morning that Bernie is standing with gun manufacturers against the victims of Sandy Hook. That is about as cheap a demagogic stunt as you could ever pull, but in line with Hillary's character. If that is her belief, why isn't she calling for a complete ban on gun manufacturing and sales in the U.S.? Let her campaign on that in Pennsylvania.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie and the "gun" thin...»Reply #12