Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Attention NY Voters Wrongfully Purged From the Rolls: A Judge Has Ruled in Your Favor! [View all]Hortensis
(58,785 posts)19. Sounds like a good judge! Widespread sloppiness,
late poll openings, and various irregularities like these allegations are blowing up in their electoral system's face. With a judge committed to making sure all citizens who are entitled to vote do vote, these complaints will be investigated and eligibility determined.
Any who had genuinely registered as Democrat and Republican long ago now, would of course now be Democrats and Republicans blocked from voting in their party's primary, not independents wanting to vote in parties they didn't belong to. So I imagine both parties are also more than a little unhappy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Attention NY Voters Wrongfully Purged From the Rolls: A Judge Has Ruled in Your Favor! [View all]
sabrina 1
Apr 2016
OP
this is super news...but why isn't this being covered non-stop on local news?
Karma13612
Apr 2016
#3
That's why I posted it here, it is not being reported on the news. We knew about the case
sabrina 1
Apr 2016
#7
Yes, I'm sending to everyone, place where it may be in time for voters who thought they could not
sabrina 1
Apr 2016
#13
No problem. No we are hearing that in some parts of the state they are denying voters the Affidavits
sabrina 1
Apr 2016
#22
No, it's not mandatory, but it was suggested by those who were present at the hearing that it would
sabrina 1
Apr 2016
#10
Thanks for this sabrina. What will it take for the provisional ballots to be counted? nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#11
I don't know. They moved polling places also a day before the primary. People need to be prosecuted
sabrina 1
Apr 2016
#24
Wow, I didn't know that suffragette and I'm upstate. Good for Schneiderman who is a pretty good
sabrina 1
Apr 2016
#17
Thank you so much for that information, Suffragette. I hope anyone doing this, denying affidavits,
sabrina 1
Apr 2016
#23
People's registrations were ALTERED. So no, the remedy for that CRIME is hopefully going to come
sabrina 1
Apr 2016
#34
Excellent news! Hope enough disenfranchised NY voters get to the polls in time.
JimDandy
Apr 2016
#32