Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
41. Nor do brown children maimed by HRC's pro-clusterbomb vote!
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 09:20 AM
Apr 2016

While a senator, she voted against the US joining the international consortium of countries banning the use of cluster bombs. Then she doubled down on that vote while she was secretary of state, even after having visited an artificial limb center in Laos and being schooled with in-her-face evidence of the maiming, mutilation and murder of innocent civilians by cluster bombs, long after formal, US funded hostilities have ended.Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was confronted by a dramatic legacy of U.S. warmaking during her recent visit to Laos.

There, she ignored the ongoing manufacture and sale of cluster bombs by her buddies in the MIC, and dismissed the continuing cluster bomb maiming, mutiliation and murder of civilians as simply remnants of the Vietnam War.


“At an artificial-limb center, Mrs. Clinton met a nineteen-year-old who lost his forearms and eyesight when a bomb, dropped by the United States Air Force during the Vietnam War and unexploded for decades, finally blew up three years ago,” the New York Times reported.

“The young man, Phongsavath Sonilya, gesticulated with his arm stumps as he explained to Mrs. Clinton that more than three decades after the end of the war, not enough had been done to stop the use of cluster bombs and to support those who may be injured in the future by bombs still lying unexploded in the countryside,” the New York Times reports. “The United States has not signed the Convention on Cluster Bombs."

More than 100 countries have signed the treaty, and more than fifty have ratified it, but the United States stubbornly refuses to join in. The U.S. stance betrays a callousness toward the people whose lives are so severely affected by cluster bombs.

“Farmers tilling their land are often maimed or killed when striking ‘bombies’ that settle below ground,” Tom Fawthrop writes for Foreign Policy in Focus. “Children are frequent victims because they are attracted to the bombies' bright colors and odd shapes.”

Clinton called the artificial limb center she visited “a painful reminder of the Vietnam War era” and added that “the international community will join us in our efforts to bring this legacy of the Vietnam War to a safe end,” as a prelude to announcing a tepid increase in the appallingly modest U.S. handout ($5 million in 2010) to clean up its mess.


- See more at: http://www.progressive.org/clinton_should_have_u_s_sign_cluster_bomb_treaty.html#sthash.aQ8xFFR7.dpuf


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

To be followed by a stunning shift back to Bernie when we hit California. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #1
Maybe we can establish a Mike Barnicle Award for a lot of these reporters publishing Clinton talking merrily Apr 2016 #3
^this^ 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #12
Yeah, the usual nonsense about coming to Jesus, and how she will get things done. Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #39
Seriously? Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #44
Hillary's sincerity? About what? pangaia Apr 2016 #53
Any day now...wait for it... almost there... just wait till NY... COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #57
Sincerity! merrily Apr 2016 #2
Wow. An undecided voter deciding pat_k Apr 2016 #4
I watched the gun violence meeting streaming live, it was a powerful event. Lucinda Apr 2016 #5
Only American victims of gun violence count. Brown people in countries where eridani Apr 2016 #9
Nor do brown children maimed by HRC's pro-clusterbomb vote! Divernan Apr 2016 #41
then she sends em off to die in fabricated wars 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #14
Hillary Clinton has never been in a position to "send" soldiers anywhere. Check your Constitution... IamMab Apr 2016 #24
you check your fucking facts 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #27
You're as wrong as the last person, only less eloquent about it. IamMab Apr 2016 #29
and you will remain blind that your candidate had influence, is a war monger, 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #38
You are woefully misinformed. n/t Lucinda Apr 2016 #48
right 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #54
Funded by Bernie...funds for guns, equipment and training Sheepshank Apr 2016 #49
are you attempting to compare his votet 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #56
nope that's not what I was saying...He voted to fund wars Sheepshank Apr 2016 #60
more likely he voted for that for soldier benefits 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #62
The Senate... tonedevil Apr 2016 #59
Both houses vote to declare war? Sheepshank Apr 2016 #61
Yes, we're all so very impressed CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #58
El.Oh.El. AzDar Apr 2016 #6
I'd take claims like this with a pinch of salt. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #7
Nice anecdotes. Let us know when you have data bvf Apr 2016 #8
Why would anyone believe for a moment that this was true? bjo59 Apr 2016 #10
My first thought was - which Clinton aid wrote this email and what did this reporter get in return? DebDoo Apr 2016 #30
Kicked and recommended! Firebrand Gary Apr 2016 #11
The writing on the wall of inevitabiity is becoming clearer with every new poll. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #13
Inexperienced tight rope walkers with no net ... NurseJackie Apr 2016 #15
Look out below! LOLOL! Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #16
It's a long way down. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #17
It's gonna leave a mark on the UNWELCOMING Democratic Party Armstead Apr 2016 #33
Bernie fans are solely responsible for their own decisions. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #42
I doubt it Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #45
Sanders will fall in line very soon as well. nt LexVegas Apr 2016 #18
but his supporters will not. 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #28
I'm sure he'll be brought to heel. lol jmg257 Apr 2016 #31
Do you realize how obnoxious that phrase is? Armstead Apr 2016 #34
Hillary gonna bring him to heel? frylock Apr 2016 #63
K&R Alfresco Apr 2016 #19
Ah, its the weekly I'm leaving Bernie for Hillary article. bobbobbins01 Apr 2016 #20
It's getting to be an almost daily occurence of bullshit spouting. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #21
And what, you're jealous of the competition eating into your turf? nt IamMab Apr 2016 #25
Who were you in your previous incarnation? hobbit709 Apr 2016 #26
DU rec for the very best reason of all...nt SidDithers Apr 2016 #22
I can practically set my watch by these "Leaving Bernie" pieces.... Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #23
Absolutely. nc4bo Apr 2016 #32
Agree, after all Brock is spending a million plus to promote this crap. They will damage the Dems Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #35
Down ticket is where the real change occurs! nc4bo Apr 2016 #36
This party needs an Enema! Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #40
Maybe you will lose Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #46
You are already supporting a Republican. Clinton. Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #50
" I like her sincerity," Graves said" HAHAHA! Sincerity!?! jmg257 Apr 2016 #37
Nice story. K & R nt Persondem Apr 2016 #43
A few people does not a shift make Rebkeh Apr 2016 #47
Is anyone in MSM urging Bernie to stay in? I've only heard "it's hopeless" "it's over" WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #51
lol closeupready Apr 2016 #52
Demographics are more important than momentum but there is still an element of the Bandwagon Effect. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #55
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A Gradual Shift Comes Cle...»Reply #41