Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

RandySF

(76,520 posts)
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:29 AM Apr 2016

Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, Cautious but Confident, Begins Considering Running Mates [View all]

Hillary Clinton’s advisers and allies have begun extensive discussions about who should be her running mate, seeking to compile a list of 15 to 20 potential picks for her team to start vetting by late spring.

Mrs. Clinton’s team will grapple with complicated questions like whether the United States is ready for an all-female ticket, and whether her choice for vice president would be able to handle working in a White House in which former President Bill Clinton wields significant influence on policy.

While the nomination fight is still fluid, Mrs. Clinton is confident enough of victory that she has described a vision of a running mate and objectives for the search, according to campaign advisers and more than a dozen Democrats close to the campaign or the Clintons.

She does not have a front-runner in mind, they said, but she is intrigued by several contenders and scenarios.

Among the names under discussion by Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Clinton and campaign advisers: Senators Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, former governors from the key state of Virginia; Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, who represents both a more liberal wing of the party and a swing state; former Gov. Deval Patrick of Massachusetts, a prominent African-American Democrat; and Thomas E. Perez, President Obama’s labor secretary and a Hispanic civil rights lawyer.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/us/politics/hillary-clinton-vice-president.html?_r=0

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I look forward to seeing her choice. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #1
I'm sure one of the Bush's is available. rickford66 Apr 2016 #2
Bitter much? n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #9
No. Dissapointed for the younger people. rickford66 Apr 2016 #26
To think that Secretary Clinton wouldn't be much different from "W" shows how out of touch from SFnomad Apr 2016 #27
Hillary liberal from boston Apr 2016 #39
Insane Stuckinthebush Apr 2016 #42
Clinton/Warren 2016 JaneyVee Apr 2016 #3
Tuesday night we will hear a great pivot. Game, set, match. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #4
A shiny happy bland corporate centrist male minority member who acts like a white person... Armstead Apr 2016 #5
How are minority members supposed to act? wildeyed Apr 2016 #7
It won't be someone.... Armstead Apr 2016 #8
How are minority members supposed to act? wildeyed Apr 2016 #17
People can act any damn way they want...The question was about the vp choice Armstead Apr 2016 #18
Then just say that you think she will pick a bland choice. wildeyed Apr 2016 #24
Actually, the primary might have been more cynical than wrongheaded karynnj Apr 2016 #34
Hillary liberal from boston Apr 2016 #43
I'm in complete agreement with you. It was an ambush. karynnj Apr 2016 #45
"minority member who acts like a white person" oberliner Apr 2016 #10
See answer above Armstead Apr 2016 #11
That doesn't really clarify anything oberliner Apr 2016 #13
See below...(we're cross posting) Armstead Apr 2016 #15
Someone who has the standard issue corporate uniform and aura and values Armstead Apr 2016 #14
That is an example, not an explanation. wildeyed Apr 2016 #21
That's what I said, in a slightly different way Armstead Apr 2016 #25
Your point was that a POC who is corporate is "acting white". wildeyed Apr 2016 #37
you might get a kick out of this: corkhead Apr 2016 #29
Well at least people on the jury understood what was intended to say Armstead Apr 2016 #32
Do you realize that this is a racist comment? I don't think you are racist. rbrnmw Apr 2016 #35
I've explained my comment elsewhere in this thread Armstead Apr 2016 #38
That is extremely racist KingFlorez Apr 2016 #40
Lloyd Blankfein SamKnause Apr 2016 #6
Too obvious...Need a stealth oligarch (or would-be oligarch) Armstead Apr 2016 #12
A unifying Bridge Candidate: corkhead Apr 2016 #31
It will be whoever Wall St. wants. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #16
All from the East Coast, most also from the last Century. Brown and Patrick are ok but Kaine would Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #19
All the donors haven't been tallied yet. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2016 #20
Keeping her support inline SHRED Apr 2016 #22
No mention of Julian Castro. MoonRiver Apr 2016 #23
I think it will be Warren. JTFrog Apr 2016 #28
From this, I think the "ideal" VP nominee is someone who does not exist - if you look at all karynnj Apr 2016 #30
I'm surprised this wasn't mapped out by 2004. aikoaiko Apr 2016 #33
Pick someone not under indictment! TransitJohn Apr 2016 #36
Stupid move. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #41
K&R mcar Apr 2016 #44
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton’s Campaig...»Reply #0