Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,429 posts)
30. From this, I think the "ideal" VP nominee is someone who does not exist - if you look at all
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:30 AM
Apr 2016

attributes wanted. It seems that you need someone, who:

- is seen as qualified to be President themselves
- is capable of accepting that Bill Clinton will likely have a big portfolio and they would have to work well with him
- is a good debater - including being prepared to be an attack dog for Clinton
- is unlikely to want to run for President in 2024. (Note they claim as given that Biden, like Cheney, had no interest in being President. I suspect that he did and was hurt by the media constantly stating he would not.)

This means an elder statesman who wants a VP job, even as defined as NOT a step to President and for which they might not be guaranteed a major portfolio, so much they are willing to have their last acts on the public stage being an attack dog for Hillary. If someone was promised either a major portfolio or who thought they would be an obvious possible nominee after 8 years, the offer might be worth the cost.

Looking at most such people, I can't find anyone likely to do so. For Biden, it would mean that he would go from being someone who did a great job for Obama on many things to a job that would likely be less powerful under Clinton.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I look forward to seeing her choice. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #1
I'm sure one of the Bush's is available. rickford66 Apr 2016 #2
Bitter much? n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #9
No. Dissapointed for the younger people. rickford66 Apr 2016 #26
To think that Secretary Clinton wouldn't be much different from "W" shows how out of touch from SFnomad Apr 2016 #27
Hillary liberal from boston Apr 2016 #39
Insane Stuckinthebush Apr 2016 #42
Clinton/Warren 2016 JaneyVee Apr 2016 #3
Tuesday night we will hear a great pivot. Game, set, match. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #4
A shiny happy bland corporate centrist male minority member who acts like a white person... Armstead Apr 2016 #5
How are minority members supposed to act? wildeyed Apr 2016 #7
It won't be someone.... Armstead Apr 2016 #8
How are minority members supposed to act? wildeyed Apr 2016 #17
People can act any damn way they want...The question was about the vp choice Armstead Apr 2016 #18
Then just say that you think she will pick a bland choice. wildeyed Apr 2016 #24
Actually, the primary might have been more cynical than wrongheaded karynnj Apr 2016 #34
Hillary liberal from boston Apr 2016 #43
I'm in complete agreement with you. It was an ambush. karynnj Apr 2016 #45
"minority member who acts like a white person" oberliner Apr 2016 #10
See answer above Armstead Apr 2016 #11
That doesn't really clarify anything oberliner Apr 2016 #13
See below...(we're cross posting) Armstead Apr 2016 #15
Someone who has the standard issue corporate uniform and aura and values Armstead Apr 2016 #14
That is an example, not an explanation. wildeyed Apr 2016 #21
That's what I said, in a slightly different way Armstead Apr 2016 #25
Your point was that a POC who is corporate is "acting white". wildeyed Apr 2016 #37
you might get a kick out of this: corkhead Apr 2016 #29
Well at least people on the jury understood what was intended to say Armstead Apr 2016 #32
Do you realize that this is a racist comment? I don't think you are racist. rbrnmw Apr 2016 #35
I've explained my comment elsewhere in this thread Armstead Apr 2016 #38
That is extremely racist KingFlorez Apr 2016 #40
Lloyd Blankfein SamKnause Apr 2016 #6
Too obvious...Need a stealth oligarch (or would-be oligarch) Armstead Apr 2016 #12
A unifying Bridge Candidate: corkhead Apr 2016 #31
It will be whoever Wall St. wants. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #16
All from the East Coast, most also from the last Century. Brown and Patrick are ok but Kaine would Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #19
All the donors haven't been tallied yet. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2016 #20
Keeping her support inline SHRED Apr 2016 #22
No mention of Julian Castro. MoonRiver Apr 2016 #23
I think it will be Warren. JTFrog Apr 2016 #28
From this, I think the "ideal" VP nominee is someone who does not exist - if you look at all karynnj Apr 2016 #30
I'm surprised this wasn't mapped out by 2004. aikoaiko Apr 2016 #33
Pick someone not under indictment! TransitJohn Apr 2016 #36
Stupid move. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #41
K&R mcar Apr 2016 #44
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton’s Campaig...»Reply #30