2016 Postmortem

Armstead

(47,803 posts)

38. I've explained my comment elsewhere in this thread

Sat Apr 23, 2016, 12:32 PM

Apr 2016

I could go more into why it seems paradoxical that outside of the primary, that a comment about being required to downplay one's ethinc qualities and adhere to the white stereotype to advance would be agreed with by many who are objecting to it within the context of the primary.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, Cautious but Confident, Begins Considering Running Mates [View all] RandySF Apr 2016 OP

I look forward to seeing her choice. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #1

I'm sure one of the Bush's is available. rickford66 Apr 2016 #2

Bitter much? n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #9

No. Dissapointed for the younger people. rickford66 Apr 2016 #26

To think that Secretary Clinton wouldn't be much different from "W" shows how out of touch from SFnomad Apr 2016 #27

Hillary liberal from boston Apr 2016 #39

Insane Stuckinthebush Apr 2016 #42

Clinton/Warren 2016 JaneyVee Apr 2016 #3

Tuesday night we will hear a great pivot. Game, set, match. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #4

A shiny happy bland corporate centrist male minority member who acts like a white person... Armstead Apr 2016 #5

How are minority members supposed to act? wildeyed Apr 2016 #7

It won't be someone.... Armstead Apr 2016 #8

How are minority members supposed to act? wildeyed Apr 2016 #17

People can act any damn way they want...The question was about the vp choice Armstead Apr 2016 #18

Then just say that you think she will pick a bland choice. wildeyed Apr 2016 #24

Actually, the primary might have been more cynical than wrongheaded karynnj Apr 2016 #34

Hillary liberal from boston Apr 2016 #43

I'm in complete agreement with you. It was an ambush. karynnj Apr 2016 #45

"minority member who acts like a white person" oberliner Apr 2016 #10

See answer above Armstead Apr 2016 #11

That doesn't really clarify anything oberliner Apr 2016 #13

See below...(we're cross posting) Armstead Apr 2016 #15

Someone who has the standard issue corporate uniform and aura and values Armstead Apr 2016 #14

That is an example, not an explanation. wildeyed Apr 2016 #21

That's what I said, in a slightly different way Armstead Apr 2016 #25

Your point was that a POC who is corporate is "acting white". wildeyed Apr 2016 #37

you might get a kick out of this: corkhead Apr 2016 #29

Well at least people on the jury understood what was intended to say Armstead Apr 2016 #32

Do you realize that this is a racist comment? I don't think you are racist. rbrnmw Apr 2016 #35

I've explained my comment elsewhere in this thread Armstead Apr 2016 #38

That is extremely racist KingFlorez Apr 2016 #40

Lloyd Blankfein SamKnause Apr 2016 #6

Too obvious...Need a stealth oligarch (or would-be oligarch) Armstead Apr 2016 #12

A unifying Bridge Candidate: corkhead Apr 2016 #31

It will be whoever Wall St. wants. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #16

All from the East Coast, most also from the last Century. Brown and Patrick are ok but Kaine would Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #19

All the donors haven't been tallied yet. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2016 #20

Keeping her support inline SHRED Apr 2016 #22

No mention of Julian Castro. MoonRiver Apr 2016 #23

I think it will be Warren. JTFrog Apr 2016 #28

From this, I think the "ideal" VP nominee is someone who does not exist - if you look at all karynnj Apr 2016 #30

I'm surprised this wasn't mapped out by 2004. aikoaiko Apr 2016 #33

Pick someone not under indictment! TransitJohn Apr 2016 #36

Stupid move. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #41

K&R mcar Apr 2016 #44