2016 Postmortem

liberal from boston

(856 posts)

43. Hillary

Sat Apr 23, 2016, 02:30 PM

Apr 2016

Hillary & Trump Untrustworthy, unlikable ratings are very high. Basically you have two possible nominees who cannot win the General Election. BTW, You do realize that Senator Sanders introduced the bill " Too Big to Fail, Too Big To Exist." The NYDN article has been debunked by Robert Reich, Rolling Stone, Juan Gonzalves (who was on the panel). http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/4/17/1516508/-Robert-Reich-just-nailed-every-Clinton-partisan-who-ever-said-Sanders-doesn-t-get-things-done

Suggest you watch this video:

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, Cautious but Confident, Begins Considering Running Mates [View all] RandySF Apr 2016 OP

I look forward to seeing her choice. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #1

I'm sure one of the Bush's is available. rickford66 Apr 2016 #2

Bitter much? n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #9

No. Dissapointed for the younger people. rickford66 Apr 2016 #26

To think that Secretary Clinton wouldn't be much different from "W" shows how out of touch from SFnomad Apr 2016 #27

Hillary liberal from boston Apr 2016 #39

Insane Stuckinthebush Apr 2016 #42

Clinton/Warren 2016 JaneyVee Apr 2016 #3

Tuesday night we will hear a great pivot. Game, set, match. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #4

A shiny happy bland corporate centrist male minority member who acts like a white person... Armstead Apr 2016 #5

How are minority members supposed to act? wildeyed Apr 2016 #7

It won't be someone.... Armstead Apr 2016 #8

How are minority members supposed to act? wildeyed Apr 2016 #17

People can act any damn way they want...The question was about the vp choice Armstead Apr 2016 #18

Then just say that you think she will pick a bland choice. wildeyed Apr 2016 #24

Actually, the primary might have been more cynical than wrongheaded karynnj Apr 2016 #34

Hillary liberal from boston Apr 2016 #43

I'm in complete agreement with you. It was an ambush. karynnj Apr 2016 #45

"minority member who acts like a white person" oberliner Apr 2016 #10

See answer above Armstead Apr 2016 #11

That doesn't really clarify anything oberliner Apr 2016 #13

See below...(we're cross posting) Armstead Apr 2016 #15

Someone who has the standard issue corporate uniform and aura and values Armstead Apr 2016 #14

That is an example, not an explanation. wildeyed Apr 2016 #21

That's what I said, in a slightly different way Armstead Apr 2016 #25

Your point was that a POC who is corporate is "acting white". wildeyed Apr 2016 #37

you might get a kick out of this: corkhead Apr 2016 #29

Well at least people on the jury understood what was intended to say Armstead Apr 2016 #32

Do you realize that this is a racist comment? I don't think you are racist. rbrnmw Apr 2016 #35

I've explained my comment elsewhere in this thread Armstead Apr 2016 #38

That is extremely racist KingFlorez Apr 2016 #40

Lloyd Blankfein SamKnause Apr 2016 #6

Too obvious...Need a stealth oligarch (or would-be oligarch) Armstead Apr 2016 #12

A unifying Bridge Candidate: corkhead Apr 2016 #31

It will be whoever Wall St. wants. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #16

All from the East Coast, most also from the last Century. Brown and Patrick are ok but Kaine would Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #19

All the donors haven't been tallied yet. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2016 #20

Keeping her support inline SHRED Apr 2016 #22

No mention of Julian Castro. MoonRiver Apr 2016 #23

I think it will be Warren. JTFrog Apr 2016 #28

From this, I think the "ideal" VP nominee is someone who does not exist - if you look at all karynnj Apr 2016 #30

I'm surprised this wasn't mapped out by 2004. aikoaiko Apr 2016 #33

Pick someone not under indictment! TransitJohn Apr 2016 #36

Stupid move. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #41

K&R mcar Apr 2016 #44