2016 Postmortem

leveymg

(36,418 posts)

20. On that, you are wrong. Here's a statement cosigned by the IGs of DOS and the Intel Community (IC)

Thu May 26, 2016, 01:46 PM

May 2016

that states that the Intelligence Community found classified information on Hillary's server originating within the IC member agencies. They weren't "retroactively classified," as the Clinton campaign has continued to claim:

These emails were not retroactively classified by the State
Department; rather these emails contained classified information when they were generated
and, according to IC classification officials, that information remains classified today. This
classified information should never have been transmitted via an unclassified personal system.

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/statement_of_the_icig_and_oig_regarding_review_of_clintons_emails_july_24_2015.pdf

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

52 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Josh Marshall: This was never more than some poor judgment overlayed by a big bureaucratic ... [View all] BootinUp May 2016 OP

Too bad there were so many federal regulations and felony laws broken. Tell it to the Judge, Josh leveymg May 2016 #1

For her opponents its a political loser, thats what he is saying and that you BootinUp May 2016 #2

The federal gov't has prosecuted two former CIA Directors for mishandling classified information leveymg May 2016 #3

What mishandling of classified info? I know you *think* that happened BootinUp May 2016 #5

Just GOOGLE David Petraeus, John Deutch and Sandy Berger leveymg May 2016 #6

We are talking about Hillary, not those losers. Stay on track here. nt BootinUp May 2016 #7

Are you so misinformed that you don't know the govt found 2200 classified materials,104 sent by HRC leveymg May 2016 #10

I am aware that her enemies have been spinning lies, yes. nt BootinUp May 2016 #12

That's what the State Department found. Is DOS her lying enemy, now? leveymg May 2016 #15

AFAIK there is no official report from the government BootinUp May 2016 #17

On that, you are wrong. Here's a statement cosigned by the IGs of DOS and the Intel Community (IC) leveymg May 2016 #20

This level of willful ignorance is going to work to completely blindside these poor saps. frylock May 2016 #22

When facts are pointed out they become silent and just move on to the next thread to spew the same. libtodeath May 2016 #28

This has to do wiith the over-classification question, whats classified when BootinUp May 2016 #34

Classified is classified, marked or unmarked. It's in para 1 of Hillary's security agreement. nt leveymg May 2016 #35

So she's special? because she's a woman? or what? snowy owl May 2016 #43

Because what they did is in a completely different BootinUp May 2016 #44

Where did you get your law degree? nt Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #4

Since when do you have to be a lawyer to know right from wrong? Octafish May 2016 #8

He has repeatedly been bringing his "informed legal opinion" on this matter to DU. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #9

You have no idea what I do for a living, and I'm entitled to privacy on this board. leveymg May 2016 #13

99% of legal analysis on the subject have disagreed with you. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #18

You'd have to have read 100% of them to make that statement. You haven't. leveymg May 2016 #21

I don't believe it for a second. I call bullshit. COLGATE4 May 2016 #24

If you were really all that interested, you could confirm that. But I think you just want to harrass leveymg May 2016 #27

The number you have reached, zero zero zero point zero zero zero zero... Octafish May 2016 #36

OK. Give me some information to confirm the representations you are making COLGATE4 May 2016 #37

Crickets. COLGATE4 May 2016 #40

How about names of the books you claim to have authored or co-authored? COLGATE4 May 2016 #42

How about the names of my children and their telephone numbers? leveymg May 2016 #50

Let's make it easy. You said COLGATE4 May 2016 #52

How about the name(s) of the COLGATE4 May 2016 #39

Still nothing but crickets. Embarrassed to state on the record the names of COLGATE4 May 2016 #41

Gee. Your emoticon really does trump the facts. Octafish May 2016 #19

From the 'Close Cover before Striking School of Law' nt COLGATE4 May 2016 #23

None of the cyber security analysts I work with have law degrees, but they all Fawke Em May 2016 #31

Right. Because state secrets should be preserved by going into Clinton's bathroom... lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #11

No they should be freely distributed by Manning and Snowden!!! JoePhilly May 2016 #14

At this point, I'd prefer to vote for Snowden. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #16

"Poor judgement" is certainly not a presidential quality. n/t Avalux May 2016 #25

This is an apt summation Tarc May 2016 #26

KNR Thank you! Lucinda May 2016 #29

He's wrong. Fawke Em May 2016 #30

"Partisan game playing" for damn sure. nt oasis May 2016 #32

My goodness. Josh does not understand FOIA nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #51

AKA: haters gonna hate Dem2 May 2016 #38

You enjoyed that, didn't you? And we are the haters...? snowy owl May 2016 #46

Some of these internet superstars are now msm. Remember that. He hobnobs... snowy owl May 2016 #45

It would be hilarious to see your approved list BootinUp May 2016 #47

My "approved" list is just many, many different sources. snowy owl May 2016 #48

To each his/her own. I read quite a range of material myself. nt BootinUp May 2016 #49