Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
Fri May 27, 2016, 10:22 AM May 2016

Enough Evidence To Charge Hillary With Obstruction of Justice [View all]

Hillary has been the target of an active FBI investigation initiated at the request of Secretary of State John Kerry since last May regarding the violation of federal laws around handling of government secrets. With the release of the OIG report yesterday, it is clear that Hillary purposely withheld emails from the State Department showing that she was warned her server was compromised and had to be shutdown. This corroborates a story from last March where unnamed sources in the Cybersecurity Division of the State Department warned Hillary about the security risks posed to her conducting all her State Department business via her own private server. There were many other instances where Hillary was warned, but none so direct as this. This alone shows that she tried to conceal that she knew the risk as early as 2011, did nothing to inform State Department about it and concealed it from the State Department once it was known she needed to hand over the emails from her private server. Withholding this information firmly amounts to Obstruction of Justice.

Time to end your campaign Hillary.
82 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
She has ended it; she just doesn't realize it yet. lagomorph777 May 2016 #1
Yes on the first 2 points... Bob41213 May 2016 #20
Are we really? I have so many of them on ignore I wouldn't know. It would be great if true. stillwaiting May 2016 #33
I don't want to post links Bob41213 May 2016 #37
One said she felt a bit betrayed by Hillary and she was thrown out of the Hillary group. pdsimdars May 2016 #75
1st Woman President - to be Impeached in Office FreakinDJ May 2016 #38
Ha!! :-D NurseJackie May 2016 #2
Love that gif and the original video. Candace Payne is one ultra-cool lady! Surya Gayatri May 2016 #26
So far, I never tire of seeing that pic. Fits so many OP's here on du lately! riversedge May 2016 #55
Another Republican smear job. The electorate chose Hillary. Deal with it. Trust Buster May 2016 #3
The biggest state in the "electorate" hasn't gone to the fucking polls yet. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #5
And he's behind in the polls in that state too. Can't make up the delegate gap. Trust Buster May 2016 #12
"behind in the polls" cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #18
And things aren't exactly trending her direction if you know what I mean.... Bob41213 May 2016 #21
That poll will not get it done in closing the delegate deficit. Simple math. Trust Buster May 2016 #22
Click your heels together three times... cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #24
Staring at a 270 delegate deficit, I think it's Sanders supporters that are clicking their heels.LOL Trust Buster May 2016 #28
Good comeback. I'll wear the mark it left for the rest of the day. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #35
Don't look now but he needs more than that: ucrdem May 2016 #39
My comeback is a mathematical fact, your denial aside. Trust Buster May 2016 #41
How many Hil-fans do you think are going to sit on the grand jury? berni_mccoy May 2016 #8
You sound childish. Not worth my time. Your candidate still lost. Later. Trust Buster May 2016 #11
So says the one calling DUers Republicans. If you knew anything berni_mccoy May 2016 #14
I was responding to your post asking how many Hillary supporters will serve on the Jury. Trust Buster May 2016 #16
Hate to point nt this to you nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #32
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #4
Who is this "we" anyway? A Democrat will win the presidential election in November 2016. tonyt53 May 2016 #13
Yet, another Sanders fan OP making stuff up. riversedge May 2016 #6
I see they've decided to double down on the Kerry crap. ucrdem May 2016 #9
I often wonder,,,, If anyone other than HRC were to do this, SmittynMo May 2016 #7
GSers are prosecuted for much less Press Virginia May 2016 #10
Yeah, and she's SmittynMo May 2016 #17
You should write for Free Republic or any other right wing rag, seriously BootinUp May 2016 #15
WOW SmittynMo May 2016 #19
No more and no less blinded that one who would write "time to end your campaign, Hillary..." LanternWaste May 2016 #27
He/she/it probably does, under a "nom de plume"... Surya Gayatri May 2016 #30
She has no choice but to cooperate with the FBI and DOJ morningfog May 2016 #36
and that supports the OP? Not. BootinUp May 2016 #42
Just clarifying your statement. morningfog May 2016 #45
you added a bullshit adjective that is not true either. BootinUp May 2016 #49
The only bullshit is coming from you. From the FBI directly: berni_mccoy May 2016 #78
The FBI conducts only criminal investigations. That is an accurate adjective. Don't play dumb. morningfog May 2016 #81
Ya let's all deny reality that Hillary is under an FBI criminal investigation pinebox May 2016 #48
What crime pinebox? I missed the FBI announcing a crime had been committed. BootinUp May 2016 #51
Do you understand that the FBI only investigates criminal activity? pinebox May 2016 #57
If they haven't determined a crime, it isn't called that. And they haven't, so yes you spread BootinUp May 2016 #58
It is called that. It's a criminal investigation. pinebox May 2016 #62
SO....WHY CAN'T YOU SHOW THE FBI SAYING IT? BootinUp May 2016 #63
Comey said the FBI only does criminal cases and there's no such thing pinebox May 2016 #66
Thats not what he said pinebox. nt BootinUp May 2016 #69
Yes it is. pinebox May 2016 #70
Right, forget it, because you can't post a citation to support your bullshit. BootinUp May 2016 #71
Here's your fucking link berni_mccoy May 2016 #79
She is not under investigation and no crime has been reported. randome May 2016 #52
Hey - "At least I wasn't indicted" could make a GREAT bumper-sticker! jmg257 May 2016 #23
She is not the target of an investigation. I have to assume you are deliberately lying. randome May 2016 #25
Her use of her server is the target of a criminal investigation. morningfog May 2016 #40
Correct. But that's not what the OP says. That statement is a link to emphasize its 'truthiness'. randome May 2016 #47
Her use of the server... Hmmm who else would be the target then? berni_mccoy May 2016 #56
The FBI has said she is not the target. randome May 2016 #59
Not true, NOT true. Comey was last asked a direct question regarding this in the last presser... berni_mccoy May 2016 #65
You're not bursting any bubble of mine. If she's indicted, I'm fine with Sanders being the nominee. randome May 2016 #68
As Comey also said in his last presser... the FBI's job is criminal investigations berni_mccoy May 2016 #72
Well, if YOU say so... nt onehandle May 2016 #29
Ordinary politicians would be making arrangements to enter prison... Yurovsky May 2016 #31
I believe they get out of situations repeatedly by promising to enact neoliberal policies that stillwaiting May 2016 #46
If the DOJ doesn't the Senate Judiciary Committee will FreakinDJ May 2016 #34
You obviously don't know what the word evidence means BainsBane May 2016 #43
K&R redstateblues May 2016 #50
What is "pathetic" buddy is THIS CRAP HERE: Herman4747 May 2016 #64
There has not historically been a Democratic vs. a Republican foreign policy BainsBane May 2016 #80
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #67
What does any of that have to do with Hillary putting our national security at risk? Fikari May 2016 #76
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #44
More right wing tripe uponit7771 May 2016 #53
Cough cough pinebox May 2016 #54
Crap like this belongs in Creative Speculation. JTFrog May 2016 #60
Does our nation chervilant May 2016 #61
The last thing we need is a president who puts our national security for granted. B Calm May 2016 #73
It's a real issue, and we shouldn't have it around our collective neck Babel_17 May 2016 #74
If there are no indictments/charges initiated, does it really mean anything? no_hypocrisy May 2016 #77
I think it would be great if powerful people were held to the same standards as regular people Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #82
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Enough Evidence To Charge...»Reply #0