Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Redistributing Wealth [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)19. Thank Gore for the Internet.
Here's how the nation's press were magically transformed from watchdogs into lapdogs:
The Powell Memo (also known as the Powell Manifesto)
The Powell Memo was first published August 23, 1971
Introduction
In 1971, Lewis Powell, then a corporate lawyer and member of the boards of 11 corporations, wrote a memo to his friend Eugene Sydnor, Jr., the Director of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The memorandum was dated August 23, 1971, two months prior to Powells nomination by President Nixon to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Powell Memo did not become available to the public until long after his confirmation to the Court. It was leaked to Jack Anderson, a liberal syndicated columnist, who stirred interest in the document when he cited it as reason to doubt Powells legal objectivity. [font color="green"]Anderson cautioned that Powell might use his position on the Supreme Court to put his ideas into practice in behalf of business interests.[/font color]
Though Powells memo was not the sole influence, the Chamber and corporate activists took his advice to heart and began building a powerful array of institutions designed to shift public attitudes and beliefs over the course of years and decades. The memo influenced or inspired the creation of the Heritage Foundation, the Manhattan Institute, the Cato Institute, Citizens for a Sound Economy, Accuracy in Academe, and other powerful organizations. Their long-term focus began paying off handsomely in the 1980s, in coordination with the Reagan Administrations hands-off business philosophy.
Most notable about these institutions was their focus on education, shifting values, and movement-building a focus we share, though often with sharply contrasting goals.* (See our endnote for more on this.)
So did Powells political views influence his judicial decisions? The evidence is mixed. [font color="green"]Powell did embrace expansion of corporate privilege and wrote the majority opinion in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, a 1978 decision that effectively invented a First Amendment right for corporations to influence ballot questions.[/font color] On social issues, he was a moderate, whose votes often surprised his backers.
CONTINUED...
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/powell_memo_lewis/
This story continues through today, where we have Chief Justice John Roberts shepherding corporate friendly law through the court, let alone appointing nothing but BFEE-friendly pukes to the FISA Court, and the press working mightily to move on to the next shiny object. Unchecked by public awareness, Congress and the Administration do their bit to advance the interests of those holding secret Swiss bank accounts, Wall Street, and War Inc.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

They run for President so they can influence our economy for their heirs and their friends.
insta8er
May 2016
#1
A wealth distribution where middle, working, poor, young, and elder demographics
PufPuf23
May 2016
#5
Yes. Their argument is that everyone benefits from free trade but in practice that is not the case.
PufPuf23
May 2016
#28
Not only did they pocket most of the wealth made in the last few decades they've
rhett o rick
May 2016
#7
It has to be non-violent. The Oligarchy would love an excuse to remove more of our rights and
rhett o rick
May 2016
#13
Violent revolutions might succeed in changing the leadership but usually the results
rhett o rick
May 2016
#20
I am guessing that is about as deep as you go. I picture you with fingers in your ears,
rhett o rick
May 2016
#50
"PS: If the Congress and Bush and Obama administrations had followed Bernie Sanders' lead, the
rhett o rick
May 2016
#47
Jerry Jones, owner of the Dallas Cowboys, a man who made it big in the oil biddniss.
Octafish
May 2016
#27
I am sure that your graph is too complicated for those that support the Wealthy.
rhett o rick
May 2016
#48
When you can print your own money, assign your own value and merit to it,
felix_numinous
May 2016
#17
I hope the Rockefellers appreciate DU running interference for them. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
May 2016
#34
And apparently all those Hillary supporters want the rich to get richer at THEIR expense.
pdsimdars
May 2016
#43
I think you give them too much credit. They are not fighting for anything and that's the problem.
rhett o rick
May 2016
#49
Wikileaks vs. the Empire: the Revolutionary Act of Telling the Truth (John Pilger)
Octafish
May 2016
#52
The comfort of the rich relies on an abundant supply of the poor. Voltaire
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2016
#53