Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Redistributing Wealth [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)37. That's where Larry Summers, who whitewashed the Bankster Bailout, comes in.
William K. Black explains why, even with Democrats, it's ALWAYS "Leave no billionaire behind":
No Mr. President, Larry Summers Did Not Resolve the Financial Crisis for a Pittance. He Just Papered Over the Problem.
by William K. Black
Oct. 28, 2010
I passed up the obvious title: "Heckuva Job Larry!" That was the moment of President Obama's appearance on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart that set all Americans cringing. Yes, he really said that Summers "did a heckuva job." The candidate that was gifted the opportunity to run against the legacy of one of the worst presidents in U.S. history has, as president, used Bush as his role model to continue many disastrous policies. It was strangely fitting that he would channel Bush's infamous praise ("Heckuva job Brownie"
for the FEMA chief who failed New Orleans so badly in the hurricane.
President Obama understandably wishes to focus attention on the economic disaster he inherited from President Bush. But Jon Stewart's question to him, which led to the president's gaffe, correctly asked about the message that Summers' appointment sent about the administration's commitment to fundamental change.
Summers had financial red ink on his hands at the time he was appointed. He was Rubin's chief minion in the successful effort to defeat effective financial regulation and supervision. (Yes, the effort was bipartisan and the Republican leadership shares in the guilt.) [font color="green"]Summers was not simply wrong, but also arrogant and brutal, in blocking effective regulation at the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Summers was made rich by Wall Street in one of those sordid consulting arrangements designed to buy influence and reward past and future favors.[/font color]
President Obama's appointment of Summers as his chief economic advisor made the administration's overall response to the crisis predictable. (Robert Kuttner gives a detailed explanation of the policies that Rubin's protégés championed in his new book, A Presidency in Peril.) The response would follow the disastrous Japanese model that has harmed their economy and damaged their integrity. The dominant characteristics can be summarized quickly: [font color="green"](1) the government would act for the benefit of the largest financial firms and their CEOs, even when they directed massive frauds, by (2) engineering a cover up of the banks' losses and the CEO's misconduct; (3) the administration would use the fictional reports generated to conduct the cover up to declare victory (due to their brilliance); and (4) the same strategy would impair the recovery.[/font color] (For more on the cover up, see here and here.)
CONTINUED w/links...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-k-black/no-mr-president-larry-sum_b_775307.html
by William K. Black
Oct. 28, 2010
I passed up the obvious title: "Heckuva Job Larry!" That was the moment of President Obama's appearance on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart that set all Americans cringing. Yes, he really said that Summers "did a heckuva job." The candidate that was gifted the opportunity to run against the legacy of one of the worst presidents in U.S. history has, as president, used Bush as his role model to continue many disastrous policies. It was strangely fitting that he would channel Bush's infamous praise ("Heckuva job Brownie"

President Obama understandably wishes to focus attention on the economic disaster he inherited from President Bush. But Jon Stewart's question to him, which led to the president's gaffe, correctly asked about the message that Summers' appointment sent about the administration's commitment to fundamental change.
Summers had financial red ink on his hands at the time he was appointed. He was Rubin's chief minion in the successful effort to defeat effective financial regulation and supervision. (Yes, the effort was bipartisan and the Republican leadership shares in the guilt.) [font color="green"]Summers was not simply wrong, but also arrogant and brutal, in blocking effective regulation at the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Summers was made rich by Wall Street in one of those sordid consulting arrangements designed to buy influence and reward past and future favors.[/font color]
President Obama's appointment of Summers as his chief economic advisor made the administration's overall response to the crisis predictable. (Robert Kuttner gives a detailed explanation of the policies that Rubin's protégés championed in his new book, A Presidency in Peril.) The response would follow the disastrous Japanese model that has harmed their economy and damaged their integrity. The dominant characteristics can be summarized quickly: [font color="green"](1) the government would act for the benefit of the largest financial firms and their CEOs, even when they directed massive frauds, by (2) engineering a cover up of the banks' losses and the CEO's misconduct; (3) the administration would use the fictional reports generated to conduct the cover up to declare victory (due to their brilliance); and (4) the same strategy would impair the recovery.[/font color] (For more on the cover up, see here and here.)
CONTINUED w/links...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-k-black/no-mr-president-larry-sum_b_775307.html
William K. Black is a forensic economist who, as a government investigator, helped send many white collar criminals to prison during the S&L crisis for FRAUD. Iceland called him to help ice their banksters, yet, for some reason, the last two U.S. administrations have ignored his expertise and services.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

They run for President so they can influence our economy for their heirs and their friends.
insta8er
May 2016
#1
A wealth distribution where middle, working, poor, young, and elder demographics
PufPuf23
May 2016
#5
Yes. Their argument is that everyone benefits from free trade but in practice that is not the case.
PufPuf23
May 2016
#28
Not only did they pocket most of the wealth made in the last few decades they've
rhett o rick
May 2016
#7
It has to be non-violent. The Oligarchy would love an excuse to remove more of our rights and
rhett o rick
May 2016
#13
Violent revolutions might succeed in changing the leadership but usually the results
rhett o rick
May 2016
#20
I am guessing that is about as deep as you go. I picture you with fingers in your ears,
rhett o rick
May 2016
#50
"PS: If the Congress and Bush and Obama administrations had followed Bernie Sanders' lead, the
rhett o rick
May 2016
#47
Jerry Jones, owner of the Dallas Cowboys, a man who made it big in the oil biddniss.
Octafish
May 2016
#27
I am sure that your graph is too complicated for those that support the Wealthy.
rhett o rick
May 2016
#48
When you can print your own money, assign your own value and merit to it,
felix_numinous
May 2016
#17
I hope the Rockefellers appreciate DU running interference for them. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
May 2016
#34
And apparently all those Hillary supporters want the rich to get richer at THEIR expense.
pdsimdars
May 2016
#43
I think you give them too much credit. They are not fighting for anything and that's the problem.
rhett o rick
May 2016
#49
Wikileaks vs. the Empire: the Revolutionary Act of Telling the Truth (John Pilger)
Octafish
May 2016
#52
The comfort of the rich relies on an abundant supply of the poor. Voltaire
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2016
#53