Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Redistributing Wealth [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)38. Wealth of richest 400 Americans surges to $2.29 trillion! That's a WOW!
Going along with the Wall Street-on-the-Potomac same old, same old isn't getting it done for me, either. These are the wealthiest times in human history. We should live in a country that reflects that.
Instead, the Jet Set sets records for good times and greed.
Wealth of richest 400 Americans surges to $2.29 trillion
By Andre Damon
World Socialist Web Site, 6 October 2014
The wealthiest 400 people in the United States had their combined net worth grow thirteen percent to $2.29 trillion this year, amidst a surging stock market and record corporate profits. The figures come from the Forbes 400 list of the wealthiest Americans, compiled every year since 1982 by the American business magazine of the same name.
As Forbes noted last week, the net worth of these 400 individuals is about the same as the gross domestic product of Brazil, a country of 200 million people. The average net worth of the Forbes 400 hit $5.7 billion, up by $700 million over the past year.
The new figures of wealth in America were generally buried in the media. Neither the New York Times nor the Wall Street Journal published an article. Nor has it been a topic in political campaigns, one month before the midterm elections. Neither big-business party has an interest in calling attention to the extraordinary levels of social inequality in the US, with endless claims that there is no money for basic social services.
Last week marked the sixth anniversary of the signing of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which established the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, better known as the bank bailout. Since then, the wealth of the richest sections of society has soared while the annual income of the typical household has fallen by five percent.
SNIP...
[font color="green"]* Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft and the richest man in the US for 21 years in a row, had his wealth increase $9 billion in one year, to $81 billion. Gates wealth has increased by a staggering $31 billion in the past five years. To put this figure in perspective, since 2009 Gates wealth has increased by nearly 30 times the annual budget of the city of Detroit, currently in bankruptcy.[/font color]
CONTINUED...
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/10/06/forb-o06.html
So, while on paper these are the greatest boom times in history, most of the boom in terms of hard cash has landed in the pockets of Haves and the Have-Mores.
Personally, I believe Ms. Clinton is superior to any Republican. She may even be the smartest person in Washington. The thing is: I favor open-government, transparency in office and policy, non-spying on citizens and allies, civil rights respecting, peace and prosperity for all, better days are ahead, we can all get it done if we all work together team, a Democratic team that runs on Democratic principles a nation of laws, not an Empire to enrich the few.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

They run for President so they can influence our economy for their heirs and their friends.
insta8er
May 2016
#1
A wealth distribution where middle, working, poor, young, and elder demographics
PufPuf23
May 2016
#5
Yes. Their argument is that everyone benefits from free trade but in practice that is not the case.
PufPuf23
May 2016
#28
Not only did they pocket most of the wealth made in the last few decades they've
rhett o rick
May 2016
#7
It has to be non-violent. The Oligarchy would love an excuse to remove more of our rights and
rhett o rick
May 2016
#13
Violent revolutions might succeed in changing the leadership but usually the results
rhett o rick
May 2016
#20
I am guessing that is about as deep as you go. I picture you with fingers in your ears,
rhett o rick
May 2016
#50
"PS: If the Congress and Bush and Obama administrations had followed Bernie Sanders' lead, the
rhett o rick
May 2016
#47
Jerry Jones, owner of the Dallas Cowboys, a man who made it big in the oil biddniss.
Octafish
May 2016
#27
I am sure that your graph is too complicated for those that support the Wealthy.
rhett o rick
May 2016
#48
When you can print your own money, assign your own value and merit to it,
felix_numinous
May 2016
#17
I hope the Rockefellers appreciate DU running interference for them. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
May 2016
#34
And apparently all those Hillary supporters want the rich to get richer at THEIR expense.
pdsimdars
May 2016
#43
I think you give them too much credit. They are not fighting for anything and that's the problem.
rhett o rick
May 2016
#49
Wikileaks vs. the Empire: the Revolutionary Act of Telling the Truth (John Pilger)
Octafish
May 2016
#52
The comfort of the rich relies on an abundant supply of the poor. Voltaire
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2016
#53