Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Redistributing Wealth [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)50. I am guessing that is about as deep as you go. I picture you with fingers in your ears,
eyes closed, shouting, "there is no oligarchy" over and over. I suppose you believe we live in a democracy because YOU can vote. And that's all it takes. And I bet you didn't read the recent Princeton Study that concluded we live in an oligarchy and not a democracy. You probably won't believe it until Wolf Blitzer tells you. Sadly I think you are ok with letting the wealthy make your decisions. Many of us are not and will fight the Big Money that controls our government.
Real Democrats don't revere the oligarchy they have empathy for those suffering among us.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

They run for President so they can influence our economy for their heirs and their friends.
insta8er
May 2016
#1
A wealth distribution where middle, working, poor, young, and elder demographics
PufPuf23
May 2016
#5
Yes. Their argument is that everyone benefits from free trade but in practice that is not the case.
PufPuf23
May 2016
#28
Not only did they pocket most of the wealth made in the last few decades they've
rhett o rick
May 2016
#7
It has to be non-violent. The Oligarchy would love an excuse to remove more of our rights and
rhett o rick
May 2016
#13
Violent revolutions might succeed in changing the leadership but usually the results
rhett o rick
May 2016
#20
I am guessing that is about as deep as you go. I picture you with fingers in your ears,
rhett o rick
May 2016
#50
"PS: If the Congress and Bush and Obama administrations had followed Bernie Sanders' lead, the
rhett o rick
May 2016
#47
Jerry Jones, owner of the Dallas Cowboys, a man who made it big in the oil biddniss.
Octafish
May 2016
#27
I am sure that your graph is too complicated for those that support the Wealthy.
rhett o rick
May 2016
#48
When you can print your own money, assign your own value and merit to it,
felix_numinous
May 2016
#17
I hope the Rockefellers appreciate DU running interference for them. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
May 2016
#34
And apparently all those Hillary supporters want the rich to get richer at THEIR expense.
pdsimdars
May 2016
#43
I think you give them too much credit. They are not fighting for anything and that's the problem.
rhett o rick
May 2016
#49
Wikileaks vs. the Empire: the Revolutionary Act of Telling the Truth (John Pilger)
Octafish
May 2016
#52
The comfort of the rich relies on an abundant supply of the poor. Voltaire
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2016
#53