Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The Weapons of Mass Destruction and the FBI investigation [View all]geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)135. so in your opinion every FBI investigation results in a prosecution. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
168 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What you have to worry about is Dems trying to be purists. GOP doesn't do that. They stick
Jitter65
Jun 2016
#134
Actually you are wrong about JW, they did during the Bush the lesser reigh
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2016
#155
I see it more as people twisting their minds to support who they've decided to support
mindwalker_i
Jun 2016
#109
But, let's face it, our presumptive nominee is a de facto republican in many ways
Doctor_J
Jun 2016
#158
"People like you, a few, they are dying off, still continue to claim it was the Lib'ral press"
NCTraveler
Jun 2016
#75
I don't know about you but I get a big 'ol belly laugh every time I see how much
Maru Kitteh
Jun 2016
#51
The emails are exactly like the war in Iraq. I can't think of a single difference. Not one!
YouDig
Jun 2016
#9
Because of the emails, people's lives were at risk. You really believe that, don't you.
YouDig
Jun 2016
#14
Guccifer. Right. Just like Assange said he would release the banking 'poison pill' files.
randome
Jun 2016
#40
The OP is comparing Hillary's emails to the war in Iraq, and you're asking me that?
YouDig
Jun 2016
#162
pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffftttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
PeaceNikki
Jun 2016
#13
I know that. I am sorry I worried about you during Wisconsin by the way
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2016
#21
'this must be human nature, the denial from core supporters becomes far more strident.'
elleng
Jun 2016
#20
It will be a media circus... ah the trolley stop is near. Because parking will be crazee
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2016
#153
Here is a blatant example of the denial taking, Bernstein can't help but laugh.
Uncle Joe
Jun 2016
#43
that moment confirmed what I had come to suspect, but others long before had known
2banon
Jun 2016
#122
Unfortunatly if Al Gore had been a stronger candidate, Naderites would not have mattered. n/t
Matt_R
Jun 2016
#163
we're not going to lose, and those whose only contribution is to say " it's not worth it to win" and
geek tragedy
Jun 2016
#119
Lol wut? She won the voting with solid majorities of votes and all categories of pledged delegates.
geek tragedy
Jun 2016
#123
that's still an emotional reading of the current political landscape rather than one supported
geek tragedy
Jun 2016
#126
that's exactly right. Bookmarking this thread to revisit to see if the great oracle is correct
still_one
Jun 2016
#130
Actually, it is a very thoughtful analysis based on the current political landscape.
basselope
Jun 2016
#141
Like Her Majesty, they've evolved on the issue. If she does it, it's OK. Simple right?
BillZBubb
Jun 2016
#157