Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
64. I'm so old, I remember the Peace Dividend.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:45 AM
Jun 2016

It was all the money we were supposed to have after the Cold War ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

Bush 1 and Clinton 1 wasted that once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

Now we have wars without end against an enemy that can't be destroyed.

The idea of terrorism? Who thought that one up? George Herbert Walker Bush when CIA director in 1979. And so the mad spiral continued, holding the fort long enough for Putin and Xi to get their houses of enemies in order for the return of business as usual.



1980 campaign:

Agents for Bush


by Bob Callahan*
Covert Action Information Bulletin, Number 33 (Winter 1990)

EXCERPT...

Bush and Terrorism

The Bush presidential campaign not only set the tone for the role and structure of the intelligence apparatus in the new Reagan administration, it also took up a new foreign policy theme which would reap huge political dividends in the years to come. This new theme was terrorism/counterterrorism.

In July 1979 George Bush and Ray Cline attended a conference in Jerusalem where this theme was given its first significant political discussion before leaders of Israel, Great Britain and the United States.

It would take an enormously important event to keep a major American presidential candidate away from campaigning on the Fourth of July weekend. For George Bush, the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism was such an event. The Jerusalem Conference was hosted by the Israeli government and, not surprisingly, most of Israel’s top intelligence officers and leading political (figures) were in attendance. (6)

Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin rose to the podium on July 2, 1979 to provide the conference with its opening address. By the summer of 1979, even Menachem Begin was willing to join in the bashing of his old Camp David friend, Jimmy Carter – a practice which had become almost endemic by the fall of 1979.

The Israelis were angry with Carter because his administration had recently released its Annual Report on Human Rights wherein the Israeli Government was taken to task for abusing the rights of the Palestinian people on the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Israel’s new anti-Carter tone was mile, however, compared to the rhetoric of the two separate U.S. delegations which attended the conference. The first delegation was led by the late Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson of Washington. It included the noted black civil rights leader Bayard Rustin; Ben Wattenberg of the American Enterprise Institute; and Norman Podhoretz and Midge Decter of Commentary Magazine. The members of this delegation were registered Democrats, yet all became very active in neo-conservative politics during the Reagan years.

The Republican delegation was led by George Bush. It included Ray Cline and two important members of Bush’s Team B form his CIA days – Major General George Keegan, a Bush supporter who had served as intelligence chief for the United States Air Force; and Harvard professor Richard Pipes. (7)

Looking for a mobilizing issue to counter the Carter-era themes of détente and human rights, the Bush people began to explore the political benefits of embracing the terrorism/anti-terrorism theme.

As Jonathan Marshall of the Oakland Tribune explains: “At the conference, Ray Cline developed the theme that terror was not a random response of frustrated minorities, but rather a preferred instrument of East bloc policy adopted after 1969 when the KGB persuaded the Politburo of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union to accept the PLO as a major political instrument in the Mideast and to subsidize its terrorist policies by freely giving money, training, arms and coordinated communications.(8)

In Ray Cline’s imagination, terrorism had now hardened into a system – an international trouble making system. Richard Pipes elaborated on the Cline hypothesis. “The roots of Soviet terrorism, indeed of modern terrorism,” Pipes states, “date back to 1879….It marks the beginning of that organization which is the source of all modern terrorist groups, whether they be named the Tupamaros, the Baader-Meinhoff group, the Weathermen, Red Brigade or PLO. I refer to the establishment in 1879 of a Congress in the small Russian town of Lipesk, of an organization known as Narodnaya Volya, or the People’s Will.”(9)

According to Philip Paull, who wrote his master’s thesis on the subject of the Jerusalem Conference, “If Pipes was to be believed, the Russians not only support international terrorism, they invented it!”(10)

The Bush/Cline/Pipes definition of terrorism was of course both expeditious and powerfully political. “Left out of their equation,” Jonathan Marshall comments, “was any mention of terrorist acts by CIA-trained Cuban exiles, Israeli ties to Red Brigades, or the function of death squads from Argentina to Guatemala. Soviet sponsorship, real or imagined, had become the defining characteristic of terrorism, not simply an explanation for its prevalence. Moreover, there was no inclination whatsoever to include, under the rubric of terror, bombings of civilians, or any other acts carried out by government forces rather than small individual units.” (11)

Within days after the conference the new propaganda war began in earnest. On July 11, 1979, the International Herald Tribune featured a lead editorial entitled "The Issue is Terrorism," which quoted directly from conference speeches. The same day Congressman Jack Kemp placed selected quotes from the conference in the Congressional Record. In his syndicated column of July 28, 1979, former CIA employee William F. Buckley blasted two of his favorite targets in one single mixed metaphor: “No venture is too small to escape patronage by the Soviet Union,” Buckley stated, “which scatters funds about for terrorists like HEW in search of welfare clients.” Then in August, George Will, who also attended the conference, wrote about it in the Washington Post.

Before the year was out Commentary, National Review, and eventually New Republic writers would all church out yard after yard of copy on this theme. Soon after, Claire Sterling, who had also attended the conference, would create the first "bible" of this new perspective with the publication of her highly controversial book, The Terror Network.(12)

With the help of George Bush and Ray Cline, the Jerusalem Conference had managed to start a propaganda firestorm.

In the following decade, the theme of terrorism/counter-terrorism would grow increasingly important to George Bush. He would become the ranking authority on this subject in the Reagan White House. Indeed, it would be Bush’s own Task Force – the Vice President’s Task Force on Combatting Terroris, -- which would eventually provide Oliver North back channel authorization through which he would bypass certain dissenting administration officials in his ongoing management of the Reagan/Bush Secret War against Nicaragua.(13)

CONTINUED...

PDF: https://archive.org/details/GeorgeBushTheCompanysMan-CovertActionInformationBulletinNo.33



It seems that before the collapse of the USSR, the CIA did see the writing on the wall. Which is why they didn't "predict the collapse." Good for War Inc!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes, in lieu of her horrific IWR AUMF vote, the above quote jumps out at one as hypocritical EndElectoral Jun 2016 #1
I would disagree that it's hypocritical. It's clearly Hillary-speak. "We will only fight wars if rhett o rick Jun 2016 #7
It's a way to be on both sides of every issue. JRLeft Jun 2016 #21
So, I'm at a party... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #2
What you said rhett o rick Jun 2016 #9
Here's another vote for Octafish! JackRiddler Jun 2016 #43
We here at DU madokie Jun 2016 #61
Me too!!! Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #65
You are a real pal, Cooley Hurd! Octafish Jun 2016 #72
You are an excellent teacher. JEB Jun 2016 #73
Thank you, JEB! DU is pioneering a new Journalism. Octafish Jun 2016 #79
"Ars longa. Vita brevis" pangaia Jun 2016 #78
Hiya, pangaia! It's from Firesign Theatre... Octafish Jun 2016 #81
Why can't so many people see... seekthetruth Jun 2016 #3
I'm so old, I remember the Peace Dividend. Octafish Jun 2016 #64
Thanks for this info. This is why we can't have nice things. ReasonableToo Jun 2016 #68
Is Counterpunch on the list of sites like FR and JW which cannot be used as sources on 6/16? LonePirate Jun 2016 #4
Hmmmm. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #8
Ahhh to be able to censor those which you don't agree with. And you have that in rhett o rick Jun 2016 #13
If Hillary gets the nom, say goodbye to free speech around here. reformist2 Jun 2016 #17
given the traumas and troubles experienced at Pacifica in the 90's reddread Jun 2016 #36
I don't have free speech around here now BlueStateLib Jun 2016 #40
Censor. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #39
Clinton supporters control MIRT and they decide who gets banned with under 100 posts. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #44
^^^This^^^ -none Jun 2016 #57
When you refer to a presidential candidate as BS... peace13 Jun 2016 #51
That pretty much nails it Miles Archer Jun 2016 #58
^^^^ THIS ^^^^ n/t davidlynch Jun 2016 #60
Why? It's a left-wing source... JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #11
That's the problem with it Fumesucker Jun 2016 #12
When do people link to Counterpunch except to trash Hillary? LonePirate Jun 2016 #14
Read some of the articles. You'll learn a lot. Octafish Jun 2016 #20
Counterpunch is not Pablum for status quo. JEB Jun 2016 #74
You're ignoring the question I asked and are answering a different one. LonePirate Jun 2016 #75
Like CNN? Funny how the centrists (corporate Democrats) used to not like CNN rhett o rick Jun 2016 #16
yes, should be obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #52
No. And I've written why not before. Octafish Jun 2016 #53
KICK Juicy_Bellows Jun 2016 #5
Kick with you +10 840high Jun 2016 #37
Send doctors, engineers and educators. tecelote Jun 2016 #6
Builds trust and makes for lasting friendships, too. Octafish Jun 2016 #42
You have also this beast now: Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #54
Fourth Urn's 60-percent hike in minimum wage WAS a strategic threat. Octafish Jun 2016 #69
See this thread, Octa, Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #71
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife Jun 2016 #10
That is exactly it. Octafish Jun 2016 #15
Those that have cheered the demise of the Republicon party don't understand that rhett o rick Jun 2016 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife Jun 2016 #23
and I hope she kicks Isis's ass from here to eternity. wyldwolf Jun 2016 #18
Boy do you not understand. ISIS was created because of us. Our government needs a boggy man to rhett o rick Jun 2016 #24
So? If a house gets infested with pests because the owners were sloppy, does that mean... wyldwolf Jun 2016 #27
Again you don't understand. ISIS provides a great service to the neocons and the MIC rhett o rick Jun 2016 #28
I can't wait to see those rapists and child killers strung up by the Clinton administration wyldwolf Jun 2016 #29
You will have to wait forever. They will invade Iran first. It's about business opportunities. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #30
get me the winning lottery numbers while you're at it. wyldwolf Jun 2016 #31
And that's about as deep as your side will ever get in discussing an issue. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #45
more like my side doesn't believe in psychic 'progressives.' wyldwolf Jun 2016 #48
Iran. Russia. Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #56
Get a load of all those flags. pacalo Jun 2016 #19
Whatever sells. Maybe she should give her rendition of God Bless America to prove her patriotism. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #25
That flock of federal eagles is looking downright imperial HereSince1628 Jun 2016 #35
Had to look up ''finial.'' Octafish Jun 2016 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 Jun 2016 #38
There were more than that. That picture doesn't show the 2 full flags on each side. DesMoinesDem Jun 2016 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 Jun 2016 #82
it gives new meaning shanti Jun 2016 #80
yet bernie sanders votes for war, war, and more war every year and his crowd .... crickets lol nt msongs Jun 2016 #26
Not really true, as Sanders votes for Op support, VA benefits, pay hikes... Octafish Jun 2016 #41
How sad. Your desperation is showing. Hillary Clinton voted to invade Iraq and kill maybe rhett o rick Jun 2016 #46
K&R For Peace felix_numinous Jun 2016 #32
No time for hate. Not enough time for peace as it is. Octafish Jun 2016 #59
Wow talk about wrapping yourself in the flag. jwirr Jun 2016 #33
It is an amazing image. Octafish Jun 2016 #55
No, I don't agree with that at all. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #63
+1 eom Arazi Jun 2016 #34
Hillary’s Foreign Policy Speech: Queen Galadriel Before Her Magic Mirror (Gary Leupp) Octafish Jun 2016 #89
Besides climate change, it's the most important. Glad I have your back eom Arazi Jun 2016 #90
Lies and distortions of what Hillary actually said? Thread trashed. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #47
History says otherwise. Octafish Jun 2016 #50
Oh Dear God NO...More "Lies and distortions of what Hillary actually said?" Miles Archer Jun 2016 #66
more here, on her unforgivable war crimes: amborin Jun 2016 #62
Well stated 'Octafish' - ..... Enough is Enough already.... I'm ashamed, as an American laserhaas Jun 2016 #67
It's the weirdest thing. On election day, I pull the lever marked 'D' for peace... Octafish Jun 2016 #83
We are the Imperalist Empire laserhaas Jun 2016 #87
I thinks she needs about a dozen more flags behind her, that'll show em B Calm Jun 2016 #76
"Our troops give their all. They deserve a commander-in-chief who knows that." pangaia Jun 2016 #77
Hillary Clinton’s Speech Against Trump Hypocritically Touts Her Foreign Policy Strength Octafish Jun 2016 #88
Clever words of omission, aren't they? MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #84
''Shenanigans.'' Octafish Jun 2016 #85
Excellent, as usual from you... and to think... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #86
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Comes Out as the ...»Reply #64