2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: If HRC IS nominated, she will HAVE to get every Sanders voter behind her to win... [View all]Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)"literally don't know what she represents" is another variation of the "duped and complacent whippersnappers" meme that will come to haunt the Democratic party in general, and Clinton in particular. It's not an argument, it's a spinning lie. They usually have researched Clinton's record far more extensively than her worshippers. In fact: the more people get to know Clinton, the less they like what she stands for. That's why, in the words of Lawrence O'Donnell "Clinton never regains leads she has lost during an election campaign". Not-so-fun fact: she has already lost her lead over Trump.
2) I am not voting for her. I'm done with 20th century relics, and that includes the dead end called Third Way. But I wasn't always a "leaver". Nor am I "hard-core anti-Democrat far left". For a gay guy, I am pretty conservative, actually. But here's why I will never vote for her: the very moment she lost me.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511483223
You want me to change my mind? Here's how:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511824845
No amount of analysts will convince me that those are expressions of some "Clinton derangement syndrome". They are the expression of a thoroughly fed-up gay millennial.
And don't even think of playing the Trump card with me. Our side has warned for months that Clinton will perform dismally against the yuuuuuge threat to the USA. If keeping him out of the White House is so important, it is not too late: you can always ask the super-delegates to vote for Bernie after all: he would bury Trump in a landslide. If you want to risk all on Clinton, that is on you. Not on me.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):