Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Time for change

(13,737 posts)
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 11:09 AM Jun 2016

About our Corporate “News” Media Premature Announcement that Clinton Clinched the Nomination [View all]

Last edited Tue Jun 7, 2016, 01:27 PM - Edit history (1)

Anybody who’s paid attention knows that our corporate “news” media is nothing but a conglomerate of highly paid shills dedicated to nothing so much as maintaining the status quo in our country – and has been so for many years. But yesterday’s announcement that Hillary Clinton clinched the Democratic nomination for President has to be one of the most blatantly ridiculous things they’ve ever engaged in – coming on the heels of one of the worst episodes of voter suppression we’ve seen in a long time, in a primary season that has been sickeningly filled with such episodes.

Hillary Clinton has NOT clinched the Democratic nomination, and our corporate “news” media knows that. To win the Democratic nomination a candidate needs 2,383 delegates. Clinton is currently more than 500 pledged delegates short of that, and she will still be short that number going into the Democratic National Convention in July. In order to arrive at the “conclusion” that Clinton clinched the nomination yesterday, our corporate news media had to add in unpledged delegates (i.e. Superdelegates) who say that they will vote for Clinton but who won’t actually vote until the Convention in July. Therefore, the claim that Clinton has clinched the nomination is essentially based on a poll – of Superdelegates. So our “news” media may as well have awarded her the nomination before the first vote was cast, based on national polls that showed her far ahead of any other Democratic candidate.

We could argue all day about the wisdom of including unelected Superdelegates in the nominating process, and I’m not going to argue that here, one way or the other. Suffice it to say that the rationale is to give Democratic Party leaders more say in the process, especially in the event that they feel that the leader in pledged delegates is too weak to have a good chance of winning the general election. That is exactly what they are facing in this case. Hillary Clinton has unprecedented negative net favorability ratings for a major party nominee, and she is involved in major scandals that could end up in indictment and conviction on criminal charges at worst, or just continued revelations that cause her favorability ratings to plummet further at best. That is also unprecedented for a major party nominee. Furthermore, a substantial amount of evidence has accumulated that election fraud may be the primary basis for her current lead, and this issue may or may not come up at the Convention, I don’t know.

In any event, the bottom line is that the Superdelegates have not voted yet, and they will not vote until the July Convention. Arguments will be made at the Convention, and then they will decide. A lot can happen between now and then. As is the case with all polls, the Superdelegates who currently say they will be voting for Clinton could change their minds before it’s all over.

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sore loser, aren't ya? tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1
Its the media's job to report the news as soon as they get it. Gomez163 Jun 2016 #2
This is not news Time for change Jun 2016 #7
Give it up. Bernie has no chance Gomez163 Jun 2016 #12
Hillary should give it up Time for change Jun 2016 #27
It is a statement of fact: she is the presumptive nominee onenote Jun 2016 #15
The announcement shouldn't have been made yesterday or today Time for change Jun 2016 #20
Never been that way, never going to be that way onenote Jun 2016 #25
+ 100 senz Jun 2016 #21
This is why they use the term " presumptive" nominee... apcalc Jun 2016 #3
They used the word "clinches" repeatedly Time for change Jun 2016 #9
Yes, you are right. They should use different words, apcalc Jun 2016 #10
The word "clinches" used across media shows planning. senz Jun 2016 #23
Give me a break, it shows that they use the same terminology that's always been used. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #29
They followed the same standards as 08. Everyone knew this was how it worked. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #4
social media is blowing up, berners are pissed off and are GOTVing harder this morning Viva_La_Revolution Jun 2016 #5
Why is GOTVing harder? Did Sanders change his strategy? onenote Jun 2016 #16
Contrary to the belief of some people, not all Sanders would be voters are hard core Time for change Jun 2016 #17
So it turns out that the Sanders revolution is supported by a significant number of low info onenote Jun 2016 #18
Thank God. This filthy trick must not succeed. senz Jun 2016 #24
So many "political junkies" acting like this is their first primary. nt Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #6
For some it is their first 😉 apcalc Jun 2016 #11
Our "news" media has been doing everything it can Time for change Jun 2016 #13
No it hasn't. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #22
In 04 and 08 Time for change Jun 2016 #31
They surveyed them on a regular basis, just like they always do. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #32
Are you aware that the new Superdelegates added to Clinton's total Time for change Jun 2016 #35
Lol! Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #37
Do not tell me what to do Time for change Jun 2016 #40
That's the problem RobertEarl Jun 2016 #41
What voter supression? Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #42
Kickin' with disgust Faux pas Jun 2016 #8
Like for Reagan in 1980. Octafish Jun 2016 #14
I remember that Time for change Jun 2016 #26
Professional Strength Propaganda Octafish Jun 2016 #34
Interesting -- I don't know what it will take to change all this Time for change Jun 2016 #39
Exactly. It's not over. The "Hill won" announcement was aimed at today's primaries. senz Jun 2016 #19
Excellent OP pmorlan1 Jun 2016 #28
K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jun 2016 #33
K&R! felix_numinous Jun 2016 #36
O is for Oligarchy mhatrw Jun 2016 #38
P is for Plutocracy Octafish Jun 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»About our Corporate “News...»Reply #0