2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)About our Corporate “News” Media Premature Announcement that Clinton Clinched the Nomination [View all]
Last edited Tue Jun 7, 2016, 01:27 PM - Edit history (1)
Anybody whos paid attention knows that our corporate news media is nothing but a conglomerate of highly paid shills dedicated to nothing so much as maintaining the status quo in our country and has been so for many years. But yesterdays announcement that Hillary Clinton clinched the Democratic nomination for President has to be one of the most blatantly ridiculous things theyve ever engaged in coming on the heels of one of the worst episodes of voter suppression weve seen in a long time, in a primary season that has been sickeningly filled with such episodes.
Hillary Clinton has NOT clinched the Democratic nomination, and our corporate news media knows that. To win the Democratic nomination a candidate needs 2,383 delegates. Clinton is currently more than 500 pledged delegates short of that, and she will still be short that number going into the Democratic National Convention in July. In order to arrive at the conclusion that Clinton clinched the nomination yesterday, our corporate news media had to add in unpledged delegates (i.e. Superdelegates) who say that they will vote for Clinton but who wont actually vote until the Convention in July. Therefore, the claim that Clinton has clinched the nomination is essentially based on a poll of Superdelegates. So our news media may as well have awarded her the nomination before the first vote was cast, based on national polls that showed her far ahead of any other Democratic candidate.
We could argue all day about the wisdom of including unelected Superdelegates in the nominating process, and Im not going to argue that here, one way or the other. Suffice it to say that the rationale is to give Democratic Party leaders more say in the process, especially in the event that they feel that the leader in pledged delegates is too weak to have a good chance of winning the general election. That is exactly what they are facing in this case. Hillary Clinton has unprecedented negative net favorability ratings for a major party nominee, and she is involved in major scandals that could end up in indictment and conviction on criminal charges at worst, or just continued revelations that cause her favorability ratings to plummet further at best. That is also unprecedented for a major party nominee. Furthermore, a substantial amount of evidence has accumulated that election fraud may be the primary basis for her current lead, and this issue may or may not come up at the Convention, I dont know.
In any event, the bottom line is that the Superdelegates have not voted yet, and they will not vote until the July Convention. Arguments will be made at the Convention, and then they will decide. A lot can happen between now and then. As is the case with all polls, the Superdelegates who currently say they will be voting for Clinton could change their minds before its all over.
