Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(45,576 posts)
25. Never been that way, never going to be that way
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:11 PM
Jun 2016

There is no reason for the media not to report the fact that a candidate has, on a presumptive basis, reached the threshold needed to win a nomination.

And calling this voter suppression is insulting to the victims of real vote suppression. The people who have faced violence and intimidation to prevent them from voting, who in the past faced poll taxes and other unconstitutional hurdles, and who today are being disenfranchised by ID requirements that are difficult for poor and elderly voters to meet.

No one is preventing a single Sanders voter from going to the polls. Not one. If they choose not to vote it's entirely on them. The reality is that they have exactly the same reason to vote today as they did yesterday. Sanders strategy was and still is to win as many contests by as large a margin today as possible thereby cutting into (but almost certainly not erasing) Clinton's pledged delegate lead. His strategy then involves taking the results from today along with GE polls to the SDs in an effort to persuade them to switch.

That strategy is unaffected by yesterday's announcement particularly since it was widely reported on Sunday and Monday that Clinton was so close to having a combined total of pledged delegates and SDs that it was inevitable that she would be proclaimed the presumptive nominee as soon as New Jersey (a state Sanders admitted he isn't going to win) was called.

So if Sanders voters stay home the only explanation is that while Sanders isn't a quitter, a bunch of his supporters are. Or they're simply low information voters who never understood what Sanders' game plan was or they're fairweather supporters -- in any event, hardly the enthusiastic, committed revolutionaries they've been depicted as being.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sore loser, aren't ya? tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1
Its the media's job to report the news as soon as they get it. Gomez163 Jun 2016 #2
This is not news Time for change Jun 2016 #7
Give it up. Bernie has no chance Gomez163 Jun 2016 #12
Hillary should give it up Time for change Jun 2016 #27
It is a statement of fact: she is the presumptive nominee onenote Jun 2016 #15
The announcement shouldn't have been made yesterday or today Time for change Jun 2016 #20
Never been that way, never going to be that way onenote Jun 2016 #25
+ 100 senz Jun 2016 #21
This is why they use the term " presumptive" nominee... apcalc Jun 2016 #3
They used the word "clinches" repeatedly Time for change Jun 2016 #9
Yes, you are right. They should use different words, apcalc Jun 2016 #10
The word "clinches" used across media shows planning. senz Jun 2016 #23
Give me a break, it shows that they use the same terminology that's always been used. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #29
They followed the same standards as 08. Everyone knew this was how it worked. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #4
social media is blowing up, berners are pissed off and are GOTVing harder this morning Viva_La_Revolution Jun 2016 #5
Why is GOTVing harder? Did Sanders change his strategy? onenote Jun 2016 #16
Contrary to the belief of some people, not all Sanders would be voters are hard core Time for change Jun 2016 #17
So it turns out that the Sanders revolution is supported by a significant number of low info onenote Jun 2016 #18
Thank God. This filthy trick must not succeed. senz Jun 2016 #24
So many "political junkies" acting like this is their first primary. nt Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #6
For some it is their first 😉 apcalc Jun 2016 #11
Our "news" media has been doing everything it can Time for change Jun 2016 #13
No it hasn't. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #22
In 04 and 08 Time for change Jun 2016 #31
They surveyed them on a regular basis, just like they always do. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #32
Are you aware that the new Superdelegates added to Clinton's total Time for change Jun 2016 #35
Lol! Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #37
Do not tell me what to do Time for change Jun 2016 #40
That's the problem RobertEarl Jun 2016 #41
What voter supression? Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #42
Kickin' with disgust Faux pas Jun 2016 #8
Like for Reagan in 1980. Octafish Jun 2016 #14
I remember that Time for change Jun 2016 #26
Professional Strength Propaganda Octafish Jun 2016 #34
Interesting -- I don't know what it will take to change all this Time for change Jun 2016 #39
Exactly. It's not over. The "Hill won" announcement was aimed at today's primaries. senz Jun 2016 #19
Excellent OP pmorlan1 Jun 2016 #28
K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jun 2016 #33
K&R! felix_numinous Jun 2016 #36
O is for Oligarchy mhatrw Jun 2016 #38
P is for Plutocracy Octafish Jun 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»About our Corporate “News...»Reply #25