Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
34. Professional Strength Propaganda
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 04:25 PM
Jun 2016

Seems those who like to redistribute the wealth seem to have gotten classified enemies of the state, even when loyal.



CIA Out of Control

Russ Baker
Village Voice, Sept. 10, 1991

EXCERPT...

Dellums press secretary Max Miller says the representative from
Berkeley, together with majority whip David Bonior--another
outspoken liberal--made an agreement with Speaker Thomas Foley to
maintain a low profile in return for gaining seats on the committee.
After one full round of legislation and briefings, Miller says,
Dellums will be heard from. "They wanted to find out as much as
they could before speaking out." Meanwhile, the energetic Oliver
North, in his role as president of something called the Freedom
Alliance, has launched a campaign to collect a million Dump Dellums
signatures. He calls Dellums "a pro-Marxist, antidefense radical,"
who would be a threat on the "supersensitive" committee. Putting
Dellums on the panel, North says, was an "extremely reckless and
very dangerous appointment."

And those who make trouble get trouble. Reports and rumors that
the apparatus pokes into the personal lives of members of Congress
underlines the danger of investigating national security agencies.
"There's a little bit of fear that if you do go after the
intelligence community, your career is threatened," says McGehee,
author of "Deadly Deceits: My 25 years in the CIA." Even the
complacent Senate intelligence committee chair David Boren has
reason to worry. According to the "Voice"'s Doug Ireland (see Press
Clips, May 28), Boren faced a vicious primary battle in his first
senatorial campaign, during which his opponents accused him of being
a homosexual. At a press conference, Boren swore on a white Bible
that he was not. "It would therefore be utterly churlish," Ireland
wrote, "to speculate on whether or not the Company has a file on the
state of its tamed watchdog's libido." Since then, Boren has called
Robert Gates "one of the most candid people we've ever dealt with."

Leading congressional critics of the CIA have been defeated,
despite their long, distinguished careers in Washington and
Congress's nearly foolproof 98 per cent reelection rate. Both Otis
Pike and Frank Church were defeated soon after chairing their
precedent-setting '70s hearings. Pike's report had been so
incendiary that Congress voted not to release it before the White
House had a chance to censor the document. (It was ultimately
leaked to and published by the "Voice.&quot Pike's committee staff
director had been warned by the CIA special counsel, "Pike will pay
for this, you wait and see--we'll destroy him for this," according
to "The New York Times." Also defeated were outspoken senators Dick
Clark, Birch Bayh, and Harold Hughes. Foreign money--possibly South
African--is believed to have financed the defeat of Clark, a vocal
critic of the CIA and U.S. ties with South Africa.

Challenging the CIA also means trying to rein in dictatorial
tendencies that naturally accrue to the occupant of the Oval Office.
"Every president of the United States, no matter what he says before
he becomes president, about how he's going to clean things up," says
Marchetti, "once he gets in there and finds out that's *his* agency,
that's *his* intelligence community, hey, all bets are off."

One man who told the truth blew his chance to become CIA
director, thanks to "reformer" Jimmy Carter. Hank Knoche, acting
director following Bush's retirement, had been called down to a
Senate committee. "The chairman was complaining that `we just don't
know what's really going on,'" says Marchetti, who was privy to the
details of the incident. "They asked about covert action
operations: `Do we know all the stuff that's going on? Could you
tell us more about them?'" Asked to reveal the 10 largest ongoing
operations, Knoche offered to name a few of the lesser ones, despite
urgings from his aide that he keep his mouth shut. President Carter
reportedly heard about it, and was none too happy. Instead of
Knoche, the odds-on favorite for the slot, he named intelligence
novice and old Naval Academy chum Admiral Stansfield Turner. "Hank
learned his lesson that day," says Marchetti.

CONTINUED...

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/alt.conspiracy/G8CP9pwqjvU



Toss in the NSA wall-to-wall Frank Church warned us about in 1975 and it leaves little wiggle room to rock the boat. Isn't this a nice democracy or what?

PS: Great to read ya, Time for change.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sore loser, aren't ya? tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1
Its the media's job to report the news as soon as they get it. Gomez163 Jun 2016 #2
This is not news Time for change Jun 2016 #7
Give it up. Bernie has no chance Gomez163 Jun 2016 #12
Hillary should give it up Time for change Jun 2016 #27
It is a statement of fact: she is the presumptive nominee onenote Jun 2016 #15
The announcement shouldn't have been made yesterday or today Time for change Jun 2016 #20
Never been that way, never going to be that way onenote Jun 2016 #25
+ 100 senz Jun 2016 #21
This is why they use the term " presumptive" nominee... apcalc Jun 2016 #3
They used the word "clinches" repeatedly Time for change Jun 2016 #9
Yes, you are right. They should use different words, apcalc Jun 2016 #10
The word "clinches" used across media shows planning. senz Jun 2016 #23
Give me a break, it shows that they use the same terminology that's always been used. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #29
They followed the same standards as 08. Everyone knew this was how it worked. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #4
social media is blowing up, berners are pissed off and are GOTVing harder this morning Viva_La_Revolution Jun 2016 #5
Why is GOTVing harder? Did Sanders change his strategy? onenote Jun 2016 #16
Contrary to the belief of some people, not all Sanders would be voters are hard core Time for change Jun 2016 #17
So it turns out that the Sanders revolution is supported by a significant number of low info onenote Jun 2016 #18
Thank God. This filthy trick must not succeed. senz Jun 2016 #24
So many "political junkies" acting like this is their first primary. nt Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #6
For some it is their first 😉 apcalc Jun 2016 #11
Our "news" media has been doing everything it can Time for change Jun 2016 #13
No it hasn't. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #22
In 04 and 08 Time for change Jun 2016 #31
They surveyed them on a regular basis, just like they always do. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #32
Are you aware that the new Superdelegates added to Clinton's total Time for change Jun 2016 #35
Lol! Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #37
Do not tell me what to do Time for change Jun 2016 #40
That's the problem RobertEarl Jun 2016 #41
What voter supression? Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #42
Kickin' with disgust Faux pas Jun 2016 #8
Like for Reagan in 1980. Octafish Jun 2016 #14
I remember that Time for change Jun 2016 #26
Professional Strength Propaganda Octafish Jun 2016 #34
Interesting -- I don't know what it will take to change all this Time for change Jun 2016 #39
Exactly. It's not over. The "Hill won" announcement was aimed at today's primaries. senz Jun 2016 #19
Excellent OP pmorlan1 Jun 2016 #28
K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jun 2016 #33
K&R! felix_numinous Jun 2016 #36
O is for Oligarchy mhatrw Jun 2016 #38
P is for Plutocracy Octafish Jun 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»About our Corporate “News...»Reply #34